Re: [RADIR] finishing the problem statement

"Azinger, Marla" <> Mon, 09 March 2009 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0363A69DE for <>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPDTTvPEERvu for <>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50283A68B2 for <>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP with TLS id 5503521.258379255; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:22:02 -0400
Received: from ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt ([]) by nyrofcs03exht01 ([]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:13:45 -0400
From: "Azinger, Marla" <>
To: Jason Schiller <>, Thomas Narten <>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:13:31 -0400
Thread-Topic: [RADIR] finishing the problem statement
Thread-Index: Acmg+x0tv6nAMpbVTFunw+KSKEfl9wAAK2WQ
Message-ID: <2E2FECEBAE57CC4BAACDE67638305F10484CBF6766@ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [RADIR] finishing the problem statement
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:13:32 -0000

sorry.  I looked it over this morning and only replied to Thomas.  I think its appropriate as revised and only pointed out some gramatical errors this time.


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Jason Schiller
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:02 PM
To: Thomas Narten
Subject: Re: [RADIR] finishing the problem statement

I'm ok with the new boiler plate...  looking over the new text now.


Jason Schiller                                               (703)886.6648
Senior Internet Network Engineer                         fax:(703)886.0512
Public IP Global Network Engineering             
UUNET / Verizon               

The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that it increases traffic on the Internet.

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Thomas Narten wrote:

> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:07:18 -0400
> From: Thomas Narten <>
> To:
> Subject: [RADIR] finishing the problem statement
> We are a bit overdue on revising the problem statement and getting it
> out...
> I spoke with Olaf a while back and he seemed to think that much of the
> initial excitement about the topic had died down again, and anyway RRG
> is where the work is actually happening. So he is inclined to see the
> document shipped and close the directorate. However, the current
> problem statement (as we have discussed amongst  ourselves) does not
> have any sort of broad concensus, so it couldn't get any sort of
> official blessing. If we were to ask for publication now, we'd likely
> be told to publish it as individual submission.
> As we've discussed before, Olaf has said the pressures on routing
> section had good stuff, but that the business section in particular
> was problematic. We've had past discussions about that together with
> some suggestions for improvements.
> I would like to get this document published as an informational RFC,
> but one with IETF blessing/support. That means we have to get folk
> familiar with this space to support publication of our document.
> I spent some time going over the document in January, reviewed our
> previous discussions and made a number of changes. I then didn't
> followup and close the loop and get back to this list.
> One thing that of course happens when one re-reads a document after 6
> months is that one sees all sorts of things that should be tweaked.
> Rather than try to do an issue by issue review, I've just gone ahead
> and revised the document; I'll send it (and diffs) in separate messages.
> The ID cutoff is today (7PM West Coast Time). I'd like to go ahead and
> post the revised document, but if anyone thinks I should not (whether
> on principle -- because you want to review more carefully first, or
> because you have specific issues with the revision), please speak up.
> I plan to post unless I get a "no". (I don't have plans to have the
> document discussed in SF, so it is not critical that it get posted
> today).
> Finally, I've used the following boilerplate:
>    This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
>    provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.  This document may contain material
>    from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly
>    available before November 10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the
>    copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF
>    Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the
>    IETF Standards Process.  Without obtaining an adequate license from
>    the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this
>    document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and
>    derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards
>    Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to
>    translate it into languages other than English.
> I assume that we are all OK with submitting under the updated
> boilerplate that grants full rights to the IETF trust, but the
> document can't say that until I get explicite confirmation from each
> of us on that point.
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> RADIR mailing list

RADIR mailing list