Re: [RADIR] Problem statement?

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Mon, 12 January 2009 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <radir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: radir-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-radir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268C23A6358; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:01:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CAD28C34B for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:01:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.051
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.051 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.548, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yl00vXDW5Ayl for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:01:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE0F28C35A for <radir@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:01:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0CHx7fK013268 for <radir@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:59:07 -0700
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0CI0mqE144196 for <radir@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:00:51 -0700
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0CI0ibC017223 for <radir@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:00:44 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-65-234-4.mts.ibm.com [9.65.234.4]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n0CI0hYR017087 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:00:44 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.2/8.12.5) with ESMTP id n0CI0gOE032648; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:00:42 -0500
Message-Id: <200901121800.n0CI0gOE032648@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Tony Li <tonyli@redback.com>
In-reply-to: <B701736AA609BA4AB6555D5E7BC490FB9E340B1B2D@RBSJX.ad.redback.com>
References: <B701736AA609BA4AB6555D5E7BC490FB9E340B1B2D@RBSJX.ad.redback.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Tony Li <tonyli@redback.com> message dated "Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:53:48 -0800."
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:00:42 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Cc: radir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RADIR] Problem statement?
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: radir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: radir-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Tony.

Good timing. I've been watching the rrg discussione and folk are going
around again on exactly what the problem is. What a sense of deja
vu...  I have felt like now would be a good time to point folk to the
problem statement...

The document has expired but has not made it to RFC. I need to make
some changes (and have been delaying for way too long) that came out
of some reviews a while back and from the IAB.

That said, prompted by the discussions on rrg, I went back last week
and started revising the document.  I'd like to get a new version out
this week and then get folk discussing the problem statement in the
document rather than just arguing back and forth about what they think
the problem is.

Thanks for the ping...

Thomas

Tony Li <tonyli@redback.com> writes:


> Hi Thomas,

> I was just updating some references and it looks like your draft of
> the RADIR problem statement has expired.  Did this progress to RFC
> status and I just miss it?

> Thanks,
> Tony
_______________________________________________
RADIR mailing list
RADIR@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir