[RADIR] RRG followup on radir-problem-statement
Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 25 February 2010 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE9B28C15E for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:40:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.462, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u7RKQ2EoTJj2 for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (e2.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.142]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C03F28C136 for <radir@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1PEWihk015583 for <radir@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:32:44 -0500
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1PEguJr136324 for <radir@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:42:56 -0500
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1PEgtO5032386 for <radir@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:42:56 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-49-153-63.mts.ibm.com [9.49.153.63]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1PEgsx4032191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <radir@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:42:55 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id o1PEgrYV006360 for <radir@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:42:53 -0500
Message-Id: <201002251442.o1PEgrYV006360@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: radir@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:42:53 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [RADIR] RRG followup on radir-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:40:55 -0000
There has been some discussion of the document on RRG. Feel free to add additional comments. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/current/msg06058.html What do folk here think of the proposed changes? Thomas
- [RADIR] RRG followup on radir-problem-statement Thomas Narten