Re: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 19 October 2010 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32443A694E for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.369, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHX+LFDLjxPs for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE31F3A67AB for <radir@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F609A4739; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:52:50 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kIdiE9dZoTcC; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:52:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.107] (pool-96-231-149-87.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.231.149.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DD69A472C; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4CBDF70E.5080100@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:52:46 -0400
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Azinger, Marla" <Marla.Azinger@FTR.com>
References: <4CBCB2F1.6040001@vigilsec.com> <2E2FECEBAE57CC4BAACDE67638305F10488C81C57D@ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt>
In-Reply-To: <2E2FECEBAE57CC4BAACDE67638305F10488C81C57D@ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF RA Directorate <radir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:51:05 -0000

I am okay with that is the RADir members are willing to put in the
effort to publish in the next few weeks.  After that, it seems overcome
by events.

Russ

On 10/19/2010 2:37 PM, Azinger, Marla wrote:
> I say yes.
> 
> The RADir one addresses the problem statement.
> 
> This RRG one is a "survey" of a list of documents, one of which is narten-radir-problem-statement
> 
> My 2 cents
> 
> Marla 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ Housley
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 1:50 PM
> To: IETF RA Directorate
> Subject: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14
> 
> With this document about to be published by the IRTF, is there any point pushing on the RADir document any further?
> 
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> RADIR mailing list
> RADIR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir
>