Re: [RADIR] call today?

Jason Schiller <schiller@uu.net> Fri, 23 May 2008 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <radir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: radir-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-radir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4A228C1A5; Fri, 23 May 2008 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E983A6C96 for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 05:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C8GUNTnC1AMT for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F011F3A6BBC for <radir@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2008 05:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dgismtp01.wcomnet.com ([166.38.58.141]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K1B0041ENRD3200@firewall.verizonbusiness.com> for radir@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2008 12:52:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dgismtp01.wcomnet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by dgismtp01.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.08 (built Sep 22 2005)) with SMTP id <0K1B000IPNRD61@dgismtp01.mcilink.com> for radir@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2008 12:52:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from meno.corp.us.uu.net ([153.39.146.71]) by dgismtp01.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.08 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1B0007NNRD6E@dgismtp01.mcilink.com> for radir@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2008 12:52:25 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 08:52:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jason Schiller <schiller@uu.net>
In-reply-to: <3002F6CC-CCF8-45D4-9898-39BBDD065CD5@juniper.net>
X-Sender: schiller@meno.corp.us.uu.net
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0805230851110.25183-100000@meno.corp.us.uu.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Cc: radir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RADIR] call today?
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: radir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: radir-bounces@ietf.org

John, 

Seems I was the only one on the bridge so I guess no, we won't have a
call.

I'm out at LACNIC next week, but if we all feel it is important to have
the call I will make sure to be on the bridge.

___Jason


==========================================================================
Jason Schiller                                               (703)886.6648
Senior Internet Network Engineer                         fax:(703)886.0512
Public IP Global Network Engineering                       schiller@uu.net
UUNET / Verizon                         jason.schiller@verizonbusiness.com

The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that
it increases traffic on the Internet.

On Wed, 21 May 2008, John G. Scudder wrote:

> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 00:03:34 -0400
> From: John G. Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
> To: radir@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [RADIR] call today?
> 
> Well the extra 13 hours queued in the IETF mail server didn't help the  
> relevance of that message much.
> 
> --John
> 
> On May 20, 2008, at 10:31 AM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> 
> > In interest of not hanging out on the phone and failing to achieve
> > quorum, are we going to have a call today?
> >
> > (I've already commented on Thomas' suggested revisions in email.)
> >
> > --John
> _______________________________________________
> RADIR mailing list
> RADIR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir
> 

_______________________________________________
RADIR mailing list
RADIR@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir