Re: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14
"Azinger, Marla" <Marla.Azinger@FTR.com> Tue, 19 October 2010 18:36 UTC
Return-Path: <marla.azinger@ftr.com>
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADE33A68B1 for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.278, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qdSt49qVn8LY for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frontiercorp.com (mail01.frontiercorp.com [66.133.172.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FBF3A6837 for <radir@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([10.162.69.10]) by mail01.frontiercorp.com with ESMTP with TLS id 91HK4M1.192899520; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:37:45 -0400
Received: from ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt ([10.160.69.50]) by nyrofcswnexht01.corp.pvt ([10.162.69.10]) with mapi; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:37:45 -0400
From: "Azinger, Marla" <Marla.Azinger@FTR.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, IETF RA Directorate <radir@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:37:43 -0400
Thread-Topic: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14
Thread-Index: ActvBgokhnKwZJBxSZK74r4FfEIM3wAtmBPw
Message-ID: <2E2FECEBAE57CC4BAACDE67638305F10488C81C57D@ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt>
References: <4CBCB2F1.6040001@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CBCB2F1.6040001@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-esp: ESP<10>= SHA:<0> SHA_FLAGS:<0> UHA:<10> ISC:<0> BAYES:<0> SenderID:<0> DKIM:<0> TS:<0> SIG:<> DSC:<0> TRU_urllinks: <0> TRU_spam1: <0> TRU_playsites: <0> TRU_ru_spamsubj: <0> TRU_freehosting: <0> TRU_phish_spam: <0> TRU_scam_spam: <0> TRU_stock_spam: <0> TRU_embedded_image_spam: <0> TRU_money_spam: <0> URL Real-Time Signatures: <0> TRU_legal_spam: <0> TRU_watch_spam: <0> TRU_misc_spam: <0> TRU_profanity_spam: <0> TRU_html_image_spam: <0> TRU_adult_spam: <0> TRU_spam2: <0> TRU_medical_spam: <0> TRU_lotto_spam: <0> TRU_marketing_spam: <0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:52:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:36:18 -0000
I say yes. The RADir one addresses the problem statement. This RRG one is a "survey" of a list of documents, one of which is narten-radir-problem-statement My 2 cents Marla -----Original Message----- From: radir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ Housley Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 1:50 PM To: IETF RA Directorate Subject: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14 With this document about to be published by the IRTF, is there any point pushing on the RADir document any further? Russ _______________________________________________ RADIR mailing list RADIR@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir
- [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14 Russ Housley
- Re: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14 Russ Housley
- Re: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14 Azinger, Marla
- Re: [RADIR] draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14 Jason Schiller