Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed?

Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com> Tue, 01 December 2009 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <vaf@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A80B3A6A4C for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:42:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPjFp48MJUtH for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B77F3A6946 for <radir@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAAryFEurR7Hu/2dsb2JhbADAUpgagiWCDAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,322,1257120000"; d="scan'208";a="71282132"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2009 18:42:34 +0000
Received: from vaf-lnx1 (vaf-lnx1.cisco.com [128.107.165.254]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB1IgY0B002692; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:42:34 GMT
Received: by vaf-lnx1 (Postfix, from userid 113818) id D62262073A; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:42:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:42:15 -0800
From: Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-ID: <20091201184215.GA11026@vaf-lnx1.cisco.com>
References: <20091129181219.2214C9A4746@odin.smetech.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20091129181219.2214C9A4746@odin.smetech.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: radir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed?
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:42:43 -0000

> I have not seen much activity here in quite some time.  Has the
> directorate outlived its usefulness?

I think the deafening silence may have provided your answer.

	--Vince