Re: [RADIR] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 18 February 2010 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678BF28C2A6; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:22:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CPgqVZaLfXbX; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:22:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7183B28C29F; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:22:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1I0Athp020971; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:10:55 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1I0OKWe129296; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:24:22 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1I0OKMN003391; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:24:20 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-48-37-10.mts.ibm.com [9.48.37.10]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1I0OJ0t003352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:24:19 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id o1I0OIlV026384; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:24:19 -0500
Message-Id: <201002180024.o1I0OIlV026384@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Phil Roberts <roberts@isoc.org>
In-reply-to: <4B7ACE90.5040209@isoc.org>
References: <4B27D884.5020705@isoc.org> <201002122218.o1CMIkZ4001896@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <4B7ACE90.5040209@isoc.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Phil Roberts <roberts@isoc.org> message dated "Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:57:52 -0600."
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:24:18 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>, chair@ietf.org, radir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RADIR] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:22:49 -0000

Hi Phil.

> You're welcome.   Any idea about when this will go to last call and get 
> published?

Current plan is to post a note to rrg about it and encourage folk to
have a look at it. And perhaps ask a few individuals to do a review.

If we can get a few reviews, and they say it's ready to go, I'd then
suggest turning it over to Russ.  I think it should go out as an
Informational document, but one that has gotten IETF review (i.e., not
just as an RFC Editor submission).

Thomas