IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed?

Jason Schiller <schiller@uu.net> Thu, 17 December 2009 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <schiller@uu.net>
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269103A6881 for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:33:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EHDRiZc7MrCg for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ashesmtp02.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp02.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.166]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4491C3A6859 for <radir@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omzismtp01.vzbi.com ([unknown] [165.122.46.164]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0KUS00736WEOHU00@firewall.verizonbusiness.com> for radir@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from omzismtp01.vzbi.com ([unknown] [127.0.0.1]) by omzismtp01.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0KUS00B4ZWEOKX00@omzismtp01.vzbi.com> for radir@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from peermon.argfrp.us.uu.net ([unknown] [153.39.57.202]) by omzismtp01.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0KUS00B81WEOFK00@omzismtp01.vzbi.com> for radir@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:48 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:33:29 +0000
From: Jason Schiller <schiller@uu.net>
X-X-Sender: schiller@peermon.argfrp.us.uu.net
To: Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>
In-reply-to: <20091215202917.GB24157@vaf-lnx1.cisco.com>
Message-id: <alpine.GSO.2.00.0912171432560.15821@peermon.argfrp.us.uu.net>
References: <20091129181219.2214C9A4746@odin.smetech.net> <200912151417.nBFEHdt7023605@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <20091215202917.GB24157@vaf-lnx1.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, radir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed?
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:33:05 -0000

I agrre.. I think the draft is fairly well baked and we should publish it 
and then close down the RADIR.

__Jason

On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Vince Fuller wrote:

|Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:29:17 -0800
|From: Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>
|To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
|Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, radir@ietf.org
|Subject: Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed?
|
|On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:17:39AM -0500, Thomas Narten wrote:
|> > I have not seen much activity here in quite some time.  Has the 
|> > directorate outlived its usefulness?
|> 
|> I think there is agreement we don't have a real purpose at this point
|> and energy seems to have moved elswhere.
|> 
|> But, I think the problem statement document we put together is pretty
|> good and I think it should get published as an info RFC. The last
|> version was in pretty good shape (IMO), but hadn't really gotten much
|> feedback either way, so others may think otherwise. (The main change
|> in the last revision was to take out more of the "business judgement"
|> as being out-of-scope.)
|...
|
|Hi Thomas-
|
|Good summary of the state of the problem statement document. I agree
|with what you wrote.
|
|	--Vince
|_______________________________________________
|RADIR mailing list
|RADIR@ietf.org
|https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir
|

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email