Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed?
"John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> Tue, 01 December 2009 18:48 UTC
Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFE128C12B for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:48:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hEto-DhwUqzn for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og120.obsmtp.com (exprod7og120.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759EE3A6838 for <radir@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob120.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSxVksJtVx5ryEcc+LQ1AS638kg/FH1Yv@postini.com; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:47:38 PST
Received: from p-emfe01-sac.jnpr.net (66.129.254.72) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.393.1; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:44:45 -0800
Received: from p-emlb01-sac.jnpr.net ([66.129.254.46]) by p-emfe01-sac.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:44:45 -0800
Received: from emailsmtp55.jnpr.net ([172.24.18.132]) by p-emlb01-sac.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:44:45 -0800
Received: from magenta.juniper.net ([172.17.27.123]) by emailsmtp55.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:44:44 -0800
Received: from [172.16.13.200] ([172.16.13.200]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id nB1Iihj43938; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:44:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgs@juniper.net)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <20091201184215.GA11026@vaf-lnx1.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:44:42 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22CF5226-0F99-4174-BDAC-977A7BE34650@juniper.net>
References: <20091129181219.2214C9A4746@odin.smetech.net> <20091201184215.GA11026@vaf-lnx1.cisco.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2009 18:44:44.0914 (UTC) FILETIME=[59C46D20:01CA72B6]
Cc: radir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed?
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:48:03 -0000
On Dec 1, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Vince Fuller wrote: >> I have not seen much activity here in quite some time. Has the >> directorate outlived its usefulness? > > I think the deafening silence may have provided your answer. Indeed. I'm willing to do RADIR work if Russ and Olaf have something concrete for us to do. That would probably involve rechartering the group. Otherwise, stick a fork in it. --John
- [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? Russ Housley
- Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? Vince Fuller
- Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? John G. Scudder
- Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? Azinger, Marla
- Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? Thomas Narten
- Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? Azinger, Marla
- Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? Vince Fuller
- Re: [RADIR] Should RADir be closed? Jason Schiller