IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rai-discuss] RAI scheduling

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55 UTC

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-dwing_2008_a (2008-01-01) on dwing-wxp01.cisco.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Bayes-Spam: 0.952-+--H*RU:sk:sj-inbo, 0.951-+--H*RT:sk:sj-inbo, 0.934-+--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:sk:sj-inbo, 0.933-+--HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:sj-inbo, 0.929-+--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:128.107.243.14
X-Spam-Status: No, Score=-205.0/5.0, LOCAL_FROMSELF=-100,SC_HAM=-5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, shortcircuit=ham, autolearn=disabled
X-Spam-RBL:
X-Spam-UnTrusted: [ ip=64.170.98.32 rdns= helo=mail.ietf.org by=sj-inbound-e.cisco.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id= auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=127.0.0.1 rdns=localhost helo=!127.0.0.1! by=core3.amsl.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=A99F03A68DC auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=127.0.0.1 rdns=localhost helo=localhost by=core3.amsl.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=EAB9C3A6807 auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=64.170.98.32 rdns= helo=mail.ietf.org by=localhost ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=WwxuksIhzJJt auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=171.71.176.117 rdns=sj-iport-6.cisco.com helo=sj-iport-6.cisco.com by=core3.amsl.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=A37E73A67CE auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=171.71.179.186 rdns= helo=sj-dkim-2.cisco.com by=sj-iport-6.cisco.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id= auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=171.71.177.254 rdns=sj-core-2.cisco.com helo=sj-core-2.cisco.com by=sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=m4CHsBQN022659 auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=10.32.240.195 rdns= helo=dwingwxp01 by=sj-core-2.cisco.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=m4CHsBEf010590 auth= msa=0 ]
X-Spam-Bayes-Summ: summary=Tokens: new, 68; hammy, 81; neutral, 87; spammy, 17.
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.100]) by xmb-sjc-22a.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 12 May 2008 10:55:42 -0700
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 12 May 2008 10:55:42 -0700
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2008 10:55:41 -0700
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4CHtfZg014670; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:55:41 -0700
Received: from sj-inbound-e.cisco.com (sj-inbound-e.cisco.com [128.107.243.14]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4CHtZtG007642; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:41 GMT
X-from-outside-Cisco: 64.170.98.32
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsAAFMhKEhAqmIgmWdsb2JhbACSDQEBAQEBCAUGCRGVBIQ3
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,474,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="30761055"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by sj-inbound-e.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2008 10:55:41 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99F03A68DC; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rai-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB9C3A6807 for <rai-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WwxuksIhzJJt for <rai-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37E73A67CE for <rai-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,474,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="97632689"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2008 10:54:11 -0700
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4CHsBQN022659 for <rai-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:54:11 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.195]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4CHsBEf010590 for <rai-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:54:11 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: rai-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:54:11 -0700
Message-ID: <046501c8b459$2f223880$c3f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Thread-Index: Aci0WS7CS8+JgfDlTHeCIqnPfELcSA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=293; t=1210614851; x=1211478851; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RAI=20scheduling |Sender:=20; bh=3LANIWpcZthjbeGPUVamrOsceV1nMtcIiv1tQXuwro0=; b=xgixj5ZXH/+mcliVH5UBetrogrf3NtZjImiVwiDz4ypoNtMHvVfvSYAkjK xBY5IAS0g4H4dfNKtFZfuWCiR/iGDE0ISSSzV/N7ewneqhAuaWT/GOf3/W+L Hcfle5oQxG;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Subject: [Rai-discuss] RAI scheduling
X-BeenThere: rai-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for Realtime Applications and Infrastructure <rai-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai-discuss>, <mailto:rai-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rai-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:rai-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai-discuss>, <mailto:rai-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: rai-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rai-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Return-Path: rai-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2008 17:55:42.0679 (UTC) FILETIME=[656CFE70:01C8B459]

In order to reduce RAI's footprint on IETF scheduling, have we considered
purposefully double-book RAI sessions which are more-or-less standalone?  For
example, SPEECSC, XCON, or MEDIACTRL could be scheduled at the same time as
SIP or MMUSIC with little harmful effect.  Am I wrong?

-d

_______________________________________________
Rai-discuss mailing list
Rai-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email