RE: [Rai-discuss] RAI scheduling

"Mary Barnes" <mary.barnes@nortel.com> Mon, 12 May 2008 18:05 UTC

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-dwing_2008_a (2008-01-01) on dwing-wxp01.cisco.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Bayes-Spam: 0.999-+--H*r:sk:sj-inbo, 0.987-2--mary, 0.987-2--H*r:sk:EDH-RSA, 0.952-+--H*RU:sk:sj-inbo, 0.951-+--H*RT:sk:sj-inbo
X-Spam-Status: No, Score=-1.3/5.0, AWL=-1.483,BAYES_00=-2.312, LOCAL_ALWAYSTRUE=0.01,MISSING_SUBJECT=2.476,NO_RECEIVED=-0.001, shortcircuit=no, autolearn=no
X-Spam-RBL:
X-Spam-UnTrusted: [ ip=47.140.192.55 rdns= helo=zrtps0kn.nortel.com by=sj-inbound-e.cisco.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id= auth= msa=0 ] [ ip=47.103.123.72 rdns=zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com helo=zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com by=zrtps0kn.nortel.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=m4CI4fR15822 auth= msa=0 ]
X-Spam-Bayes-Summ: summary=Tokens: new, 53; hammy, 86; neutral, 113; spammy, 17.
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.100]) by xmb-sjc-22a.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 12 May 2008 11:05:18 -0700
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 12 May 2008 11:05:18 -0700
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2008 11:05:10 -0700
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4CI5AFf003048 for <dwing@exch.cisco.com>; Mon, 12 May 2008 11:05:10 -0700
Received: from sj-inbound-e.cisco.com (sj-inbound-e.cisco.com [128.107.243.14]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4CI3wng011416 for <dwing@cisco.com>; Mon, 12 May 2008 18:05:10 GMT
X-from-outside-Cisco: 47.140.192.55
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkBAOcjKEgvjMA3mmdsb2JhbACSDQEBAQEBCAUIBxGZcQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,474,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="30762945"
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com ([47.140.192.55]) by sj-inbound-e.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA; 12 May 2008 11:05:10 -0700
Received: from zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com (zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com [47.103.123.72]) by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id m4CI4fR15822; Mon, 12 May 2008 18:04:41 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Rai-discuss] RAI scheduling
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:02:10 -0500
Message-ID: <F66D7286825402429571678A16C2F5EE036AD490@zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <046501c8b459$2f223880$c3f0200a@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Rai-discuss] RAI scheduling
Thread-Index: Aci0WS7CS8+JgfDlTHeCIqnPfELcSAAAG4Fw
References: <046501c8b459$2f223880$c3f0200a@cisco.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, rai-discuss@ietf.org
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=mary.barnes@nortel.com; dkim=neutral
Return-Path: mary.barnes@nortel.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2008 18:05:18.0383 (UTC) FILETIME=[BC9273F0:01C8B45A]

Personally, I attend both SIP and XCON and due to past conflicts have
only been able to attend MEDIACTRL half the time (I think it's been
scheduled opposite SIMPLE twice).  Also, given that MEDIACTRL does have
interactions with SDP, I don't think it's good for those folks to miss
MMUSIC.

Personally, I liked the schedule last time whereby we had no RAI
conflicts due to limiting groups like SIPPING, SIP and MMUSIC to one
session. The negative side of that of course was that we missed out on
discussing some key topics. OF course, there's been no discussion on
those topics (e.g., SIP extensibility: INFO, TOTE, etc.) on the list, so
maybe they're not so important. 

Mary. 

-----Original Message-----
From: rai-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rai-discuss-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Dan Wing
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 12:54 PM
To: rai-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: [Rai-discuss] RAI scheduling

In order to reduce RAI's footprint on IETF scheduling, have we
considered purposefully double-book RAI sessions which are more-or-less
standalone?  For example, SPEECSC, XCON, or MEDIACTRL could be scheduled
at the same time as SIP or MMUSIC with little harmful effect.  Am I
wrong?

-d

_______________________________________________
Rai-discuss mailing list
Rai-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai-discuss