Re: [Rai-discuss] Schema --> RelaxNG
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 14 July 2006 19:02 UTC
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3-dwing_2006_ab (2006-06-01) on dwing-wxp.amer.cisco.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Bayes-Spam: 0.989-+--H*r:4.43, 0.985-4--H*r:sk:ietf-mx, 0.977-+--H*r:esmtp, 0.967-+--H*r:Exim, 0.966-+--H*r:helo
X-Spam-Status: No, Score=-100.7/5.0, AWL=0.060,BAYES_20=-0.74, LOCAL_ALWAYSTRUE=0.01,USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, autolearn=no
X-Spam-RBL: _RBL_
X-Spam-UnTrusted: [ ip=156.154.16.145 rdns= helo=megatron.ietf.org by=sj-inbound-f.cisco.com ident= envfrom= intl=0 id= auth= ] [ ip=127.0.0.1 rdns= helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com by=megatron.ietf.org ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=1G1Svz-0002f6-Rv auth= ] [ ip=10.91.34.44 rdns= helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org by=megatron.ietf.org ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=1G1Svy-0002ey-MW auth= ] [ ip=134.102.201.19 rdns=m2 helo=!127.0.0.1! by=informatik.uni-bremen.de ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=k6EJ2Pf5017855 auth= ]
X-Spam-Bayes-Summ: summary=Tokens: new, 86; hammy, 51; neutral, 95; spammy, 24.
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.63]) by xmb-sjc-22a.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:02:55 -0700
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:02:54 -0700
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jul 2006 12:02:46 -0700
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6EJ2jWT030436; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:02:45 -0700
Received: from sj-inbound-f.cisco.com (sj-inbound-f.cisco.com [128.107.234.207]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k6EJ2cK1022922; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([156.154.16.145]) by sj-inbound-f.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jul 2006 12:02:44 -0700
X-from-outside-Cisco: 156.154.16.145
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k=
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,244,1149490800"; d="scan'208"; a="42900084:sNHT73639134"
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1Svz-0002f6-Rv; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:02:43 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1Svy-0002ey-MW; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:02:42 -0400
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([2001:638:708:30c9:209:3dff:fe00:7136] helo=informatik.uni-bremen.de) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1Svx-00046R-4V; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:02:42 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (m2 [134.102.201.19]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.2) with ESMTP id k6EJ2Pf5017855; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:02:25 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <D33EF657-9287-48E4-BC47-F4BD30F2FD78@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <D33EF657-9287-48E4-BC47-F4BD30F2FD78@cs.columbia.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <CFF906EB-9F0F-453E-9258-6B7C047B16D9@tzi.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Subject: Re: [Rai-discuss] Schema --> RelaxNG
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:02:21 -0400
To: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: xcon@ietf.forg, rai-discuss@ietf.org, ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rai-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for Realtime Applications and Infrastructure <rai-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai-discuss>, <mailto:rai-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/private/rai-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:rai-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai-discuss>, <mailto:rai-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rai-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=cabo@tzi.org; dkim=neutral
Return-Path: rai-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2006 19:02:54.0879 (UTC) FILETIME=[1CDCE2F0:01C6A778]
> I would suggest that the RAI area declare that new efforts should, > by default, use RelaxNG rather than Schema unless there is a strong > reason to do otherwise, such as extending existing Schema-specified > work. Yes, please. Moving to Relax-NG (typically in compact form) for specification work is and has been a trend that is almost universal in the XML community, for many good reasons. (Oh, and this needn't be limited to RAI; it may be easier to get IETF consensus on this than some may think.) Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ Rai-discuss mailing list Rai-discuss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai-discuss
- [Ecrit] Schema --> RelaxNG Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Rai-discuss] Schema --> RelaxNG Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ecrit] Re: [Rai-discuss] Schema --> RelaxNG Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Ecrit] Re: [Rai-discuss] Schema --> RelaxNG Carsten Bormann