[RAI] RAI processes for handling work effectively
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 07:03 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=18829a7440=gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB23421F9F62 for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.245, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gC+LOsE9WmXI for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F9421F9F60 for <rai@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d6d000003d54-7a-51c157bb046c
Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0A.F0.15700.BB751C15; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.60] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:03:23 +0200
Message-ID: <51C157BA.70509@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:03:22 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rai@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrJJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7u8IOBBptOm1l83vKM1YHRY8mS n0wBjFHcNkmJJWXBmel5+nYJ3Bm3121hKvjAV9E5+zVzA2MrTxcjJ4eEgInE3ROrGSFsMYkL 99azdTFycQgJnGKUmHXoKAuEs4ZRYuvju6wgVbwCmhKzzk0H62ARUJXomf+FCcRmE7CQ2HLr PguILSoQJTFn3QM2iHpBiZMzn4DFRQQEJBY8W8EMYgsDbZ6ybgETxGZJiS0v2tlBbGYBPYkp V1sYIWx5ie1v54DVCwloSyx/1sIygZF/FpKxs5C0zELSsoCReRUje25iZk56ueEmRmBIHdzy W3cH46lzIocYpTlYlMR5P5zaFSgkkJ5YkpqdmlqQWhRfVJqTWnyIkYmDE0RwSQEDacbWH7k8 KXWeRosONeiLMjhWc/bpnHOzY/t9ucLW60CdxqV37gcW+gVrr333bOlvpmmbmArXr2LdNVmW S/dZS7TAVP/Gi6tuVK1WLn7nbKiyX2ct94Mj3w8/619zpmXStolTv/owayy9fGsFYwHjvTmK 5UcNfdQW3Tl0UOpygl9XymGHeVe6lFiKMxINtZiLihMBN8gERPwBAAA=
Subject: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effectively
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:03:40 -0000
Folks, as you know, in the RAI area we have always considered having effective processes to help us produce relevant and timely specifications a very important issue. When our environment has changed, we have sometimes modified or fine tuned our processes in order to continue being effective. A few examples (among many others) of such changes were the introduction of mentors, the old SIPPING process, P headers, and the current DISPATCH process. It is time for us to look at the current state of affairs and discuss whether or not we need to do certain things in a different way. In particular, we currently have a few groups (e.g., RTCWeb and CLUE) that work on higher-level constructions, which use elements developed in other working groups. For example, CLUE could potentially specify a mechanism that used mechanisms developed in MMUSIC or AVTEXT such as the offer/answer model and a number of RTP extensions. Note that what we called "higher-level constructions" above are referred to by different names by different people: architectures, applications, frameworks, etc. It does not really matter how we call them because this discussion is not about terminology and it is fairly clear what this type of work is about. The way this type of work is currently done in RAI requires the high-level WGs and the WGs developing the individual pieces to communicate often. Those communications are not always easy, since different WGs sometimes have different views on priorities, requirements, use cases, etc. What we would like to get your feedback on is: do we need a better way to handle this type of work in RAI or our current process is as good as it gets? Note that we are interested in getting constructive feedback and ideas on how to improve things. Please, focus your feedback on those aspects. Thanks, Gonzalo (on behalf of both RAI ADs)
- [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effectively Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Brian Rosen
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… John Leslie
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Ben Campbell
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Michael Hammer
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… SM
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Martin Thomson
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Martin Thomson
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] RAI processes for handling work effecti… Harald Alvestrand