RE: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

Dave Thaler <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com> Tue, 08 May 2007 20:00 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlVri-0004Dq-83; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:00:54 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlVrh-0004Di-TB for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:00:53 -0400
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.215]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlVre-0002dD-RT for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:00:53 -0400
Received: from tk1-exhub-c101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.56.116.111) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.685.24; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:00:50 -0700
Received: from win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.69.169) by tk1-exhub-c101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.56.116.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.0.685.25; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:00:49 -0700
Received: from WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.25]) by win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 8 May 2007 13:00:48 -0700
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:00:06 -0700
Message-ID: <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA567@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9C89CA0-D5ED-401B-8F3A-429E9F9320B4@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Thread-Index: AceRqpxA03htGHo9QzmBdjTGmSR2/wAAGerg
References: <8F47F550-6224-4AFF-8359-CBA98D3F2FAB@muada.com> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA470@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4CAC9C6F-80B5-40ED-B838-04CA120A7D40@cisco.com> <D9C89CA0-D5ED-401B-8F3A-429E9F9320B4@cisco.com>
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com>
To: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>, Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2007 20:00:48.0585 (UTC) FILETIME=[9273DB90:01C791AB]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

I disagree with Yakov for a completely different reason.

Pull scales, but is slow and can break apps as a result.
Push *everything* doesn't scale.
Push DOES scale as long as you don't push everything but only push
log(N)
stuff.

So I disagree with "push doesn't scale" unless you define "push" as
"push everything", in which case I disagree with "pick one".

-Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Li [mailto:tli@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 12:53 PM
> To: Dino Farinacci
> Cc: Dave Thaler; ram@iab.org
> Subject: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
> 
> 
> On May 8, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> 
> > For the last few months I have been sporting a new saying, inspired
> > by our esteemed Yakov:
> >
> > "Pull doesn't scale, Push doesn't scale, pick one".  ;-)
> 
> 
> Unfortunately, that's simply not true.  Pull does scale.  See DNS.
> Perhaps a more accurate saying would be:
> 
> 	"Push doesn't scale, pull is slow, pick one."
> 
> As always, it's a time/space tradeoff.
> 
> ;-)
> 
> Tony


_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram