Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com> Sat, 21 July 2007 22:03 UTC
Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ICN38-00028k-Uh; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:03:42 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICN36-0001zS-O9
for ram@iab.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:03:40 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72]
helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ICN35-0001ed-GY for ram@iab.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:03:40 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21])
by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2007 15:03:39 -0700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAEceokarR7MV/2dsb2JhbAA
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,567,1175497200";
d="scan'208"; a="505704428:sNHT25644950"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237])
by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6LM3cZk018376;
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:03:38 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com
[171.70.151.144])
by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l6LM3cA0023885;
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:03:38 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by
xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:03:38 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([10.21.85.127]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:03:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <46A1F2C4.9040605@firstpr.com.au>
References: <469C962B.1090600@firstpr.com.au> <12D6E107-9D58-487A-BC5C-6BAC9495EC96@cisco.com>
<46A084FE.9000003@firstpr.com.au> <46A1F2C4.9040605@firstpr.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <717ED303-3EE5-4A84-9E9D-90F0F36B2377@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:03:31 -0700
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2007 22:03:38.0195 (UTC)
FILETIME=[FDA69A30:01C7CBE2]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=432; t=1185055418;
x=1185919418; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20LISP=20NERD/CONS,
=20eFIT-APT=20&=20Ivip=20com pared |Sender:=20;
bh=r0aypbPWc/jjyDOJlWFKrWk5o98WarLfFZ9P8N7yOP0=;
b=E00SueG1c8Y46ELBTSkghg5uhUNcbbk9uEouy9C3t+vbFu4m1MuBOTTKcdOIEfThHW6XAXCe
WcWT80j0PgNCwGOmGdTbCsuq6NN7+aLrYuVSInC0/VoAJIH9utT6bz2pWXx66rMNp32tVNVZno
1qkKsrELtgkFeXWY12Le3FsX8=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si
g from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>,
<mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>,
<mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org
> Most importantly, I correct my mistake of not recognising that > that LISP-CONS does not contain any Priority or Weight information > in its mapping - which means that the LISP-CONS ITR has a simple > job, with no decisions or involvement in determining reachability. You are mistaken again. ;-) Section 6.4 of the CONS-01 draft illustrates that a priority and weight are associated with each locator record. Dino _______________________________________________ RAM mailing list RAM@iab.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram
- [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle
- RE: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Eliot Lear
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle
- RE: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle
- RE: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Templin, Fred L
- RE: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle
- RE: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Dan Jen
- Re: [RAM] LISP NERD/CONS, eFIT-APT & Ivip compared Robin Whittle