Re: [RAM] Number of DFZ routers

HeinerHummel@aol.com Sat, 07 July 2007 13:51 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7AhW-000314-Gd; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:51:54 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7AhU-00030z-Om for ram@iab.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:51:52 -0400
Received: from imo-m12.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.171] helo=imo-m12.mail.aol.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7AhQ-00009p-GQ for ram@iab.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:51:52 -0400
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-m12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id z.cde.132c3069 (39952); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:51:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <cde.132c3069.33c0f466@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:51:34 EDT
Subject: Re: [RAM] Number of DFZ routers
To: iljitsch@muada.com, rw@firstpr.com.au
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5014
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6cca30437e2d04f45110f2ff8dc1b1d5
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2070775332=="
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

 
In einer eMail vom 06.07.2007 19:27:04 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
iljitsch@muada.com:

>  Unfortunately, no BGP experts think that such improvements
> are  feasible.  Maybe some unconventional ideas from
> non-experts might  be helpful.





BGP needs to be replaced, not repaired. A 200 k FIB should be proof enough  
that this is the wrong way to go.  2k should be sufficient for a 100 times  
bigger internet. It's the basic concept of BGP which is totally wrong.  Other, 
secondary parts (Hello's etc.) can be re-used of course.
Me and my research partners hope to come up with a respective solution  soon.
 
Heiner
 
_www.hummel-research.de_ (http://www.hummel-research.de)  



   
_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram