IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 09 May 2007 17:49 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlqHd-0000zh-1V; Wed, 09 May 2007 13:49:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlqHb-0000zZ-QE for ram@iab.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 13:48:59 -0400
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlqHa-00042P-HW for ram@iab.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 13:48:59 -0400
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2007 19:48:59 +0200
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l49Hmvj8015798; Wed, 9 May 2007 19:48:57 +0200
Received: from adsl-247-3-fixip.tiscali.ch (ams3-vpn-dhcp408.cisco.com [10.61.65.152]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l49HmslZ004094; Wed, 9 May 2007 17:48:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4642097F.2070800@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 19:48:47 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
References: <8F47F550-6224-4AFF-8359-CBA98D3F2FAB@muada.com> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA470@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <9C228355-9425-4C66-A9A7-47498490E3B1@virtualized.org> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA59D@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com><86588E66-ACED-4DD2-B286-3DA5B2518B1A@virtualized.org><4641750A.9010906@cisco.com><283D52E5-AD3A-40FA-B81C-27DD950176CA@virtualized.org><4641F33B.4070103@cisco.com><2CB91D98-4CA3-4F4E-A2F6-CFEF5E04C0DB@virtualized.org> <4642008D.2010100@cisco.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029ED79F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029ED79F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=277; t=1178732937; x=1179596937; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20The=20mapping=20problem=3A=20rendezvous=20poi nts? |Sender:=20; bh=B8vUioPQudDhnbZakD7e7XRjZJGu30dzF/4wBtIhqLc=; b=LmM/3J/7bj5BTtQxgzUenLCCdxXTeDwar0CZfMn39nj0/j7RyoIEn+yuoyAXqEL5QfuQVV1z mE7ttvf01c81VpC9J7e867jk4tOvH4KPTc0P6VldikDbaUo0ejjQSp7G;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

Templin, Fred L wrote:
> When the device making the query isn't the host, but it is
> *tightly-coupled* with the host, then it should be OK too.
>   

Depending on the details, yes.  If you add signaling to the host, 
however, transition becomes "interesting".

Eliot

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email