Re: [RAM] Number of DFZ routers

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Fri, 06 July 2007 17:26 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I6ra7-0000FN-8P; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:26:59 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I6ra5-0008RM-6Y for ram@iab.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:26:57 -0400
Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I6ra0-0006F0-QG for ram@iab.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:26:57 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.93] ([83.68.31.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l66HNVSA058734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:23:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
In-Reply-To: <465BA0DB.3070000@firstpr.com.au>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0705281004210.18621-100000@iscserv1> <465BA0DB.3070000@firstpr.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <F11163E4-EBEC-4182-B746-D13A01958AC3@muada.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] Number of DFZ routers
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:05:46 +0200
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on sequoia.muada.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

On 29-mei-2007, at 5:41, Robin Whittle wrote:

> So if BGP could be radically improved, RAM-based FIBs would
> make the global routing system support finer-grained address
> assignment with greater efficiency of use, while supporting
> existing BGP multihoming practices to a granularity of 256
> IP addresses.  This would reduce the size and scope of the
> problems which remain to be solved by LISP etc.

> Unfortunately, no BGP experts think that such improvements
> are feasible.  Maybe some unconventional ideas from
> non-experts might be helpful.

If you present a common goal along with a list of things we're  
allowed to break, coming up with a new routing protocol that better  
meets these goals than BGP won't be too difficult. Shoehorning the  
changes into BGP would be harder. Deploying it a challenge. But the  
real problem is agreeing on the goals and throwing out current  
"features".

iljitsch@bgpexpert.com

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram