[RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 08 August 2007 09:12 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIhaP-0007lb-B1; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:12:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIhaN-0007lU-F9 for ram@iab.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:12:11 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIhaM-0002li-1Z for ram@iab.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:12:11 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 1457C1C00E0; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:12:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5571C00DF; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:12:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0E958ECC0; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:12:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:12:09 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
Message-ID: <20070808091209.GB11514@nic.fr>
References: <46B294D6.7070700@firstpr.com.au> <20070803095100.GF69215@Space.Net> <46B8971C.3020008@firstpr.com.au> <46B89D78.8090407@uclouvain.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46B89D78.8090407@uclouvain.be>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>, ram@iab.org
Subject: [RAM] Re: Renumbering impossibility: TSL/SSL certs, DNS delegation etc.
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:27:36PM +0200,
 Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be> wrote 
 a message of 31 lines which said:

> They don't need to keep the same IP address always and some ISPs
> that are charging premium for 'static' IP addresses make sure that
> DHCP assigned addresses change every few days. [...] Endusers don't
> care about portability of addresses, most of the time, they don't
> see the IP addresses.

So what? Most end users, today, do not even need IP, an ALG with HTTP
would be sufficient for them (I am old enough to remember Compuserve
and AOL 1.0). Do we want to maintain the crippled Internet that so
many unfortunate users experience today or do we want a better
solution (RFC 4924)?



_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram