Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com> Tue, 08 May 2007 20:55 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlWiF-0007A3-O6; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:55:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlWiE-00079y-Rh for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:55:10 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlWiC-00056a-I4 for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:55:10 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2007 13:55:04 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,507,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="146173253:sNHT2102940720"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l48Kt4uP032180; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:55:04 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l48Kt40f028706; Tue, 8 May 2007 20:55:04 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 8 May 2007 13:55:04 -0700
Received: from [171.70.225.152] ([171.70.225.152]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 8 May 2007 13:55:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200705082008.l48K8aJ91500@merlot.juniper.net>
References: <200705082008.l48K8aJ91500@merlot.juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <16EFB899-EE7A-4031-9904-19AB18F20EB1@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:55:02 -0700
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2007 20:55:03.0597 (UTC) FILETIME=[269745D0:01C791B3]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=366; t=1178657704; x=1179521704; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20The=20mapping=20problem=3A=20rendezvous=20poi nts?=20 |Sender:=20; bh=Ewsss7FmBzx0dB0EK/Srs1F8VjVt/LL5gsBzEBxhplw=; b=ZhHky3L7FFnVeMDRg4JWrUDmTPjp3ryicaNuq/BC3wDGpet3MRTv6Ytq9jEmSBYW7QmfBrC2 RdAjH5UYuMLDw4nlUdUfjDlj39G/dvzuNidOH2h4zKhhZOWhLWoZ03Jg;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>, ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

>> I disagree with Yakov for a completely different reason.
>
> Just for clarification, "Pull doesn't scale, Push doesn't scale,
> pick one" is coming from Dino, not from myself. So, you disagree  
> with Dino,
> not with me.

Sorry Yakov. No one picked up your quote about topology and  
addressing. That is what I based the "syntax" of my saying.

Dino

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram