IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com> Tue, 08 May 2007 20:53 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlWgr-0005Nv-Sx; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:53:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlWgq-0005NP-9l for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:53:44 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlWgn-0004zc-V7 for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:53:44 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2007 13:53:41 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,507,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="146172508:sNHT38359476"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l48KrfrY030462; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:53:41 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l48KreEs028356; Tue, 8 May 2007 20:53:41 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 8 May 2007 13:53:38 -0700
Received: from [171.70.225.152] ([171.70.225.152]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 8 May 2007 13:53:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <D9C89CA0-D5ED-401B-8F3A-429E9F9320B4@cisco.com>
References: <8F47F550-6224-4AFF-8359-CBA98D3F2FAB@muada.com> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA470@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4CAC9C6F-80B5-40ED-B838-04CA120A7D40@cisco.com> <D9C89CA0-D5ED-401B-8F3A-429E9F9320B4@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <9131B2A2-6EA1-43A2-8CB4-121A84939D43@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:53:36 -0700
To: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2007 20:53:38.0050 (UTC) FILETIME=[F399D620:01C791B2]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=310; t=1178657621; x=1179521621; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20The=20mapping=20problem=3A=20rendezvous=20poi nts? |Sender:=20; bh=JfgD2OXgtWb+BcYm+w/1rHBHburJwqJ7oJCwMJAdVjw=; b=n1/wXrfzhgS7QZ4LwEdDOtMMsLuCZCcMRtSeptETD7+DJCEs+si0EmvLnH58jIQB0B1NLFkb sque/EbwcgqzHQc/iiTdziCF/bZH+NFZM7J//HhfZvrrCsFcNO5Z/mKA;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

> Unfortunately, that's simply not true.  Pull does scale.  See DNS.   
> Perhaps a more accurate saying would be:
>
> 	"Push doesn't scale, pull is slow, pick one."
>
> As always, it's a time/space tradeoff.

Pulling implies caching. And some have said (not me) that caching  
doesn't scale.

Dino

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email