Re: [RAM] Different approaches for different protocols

Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Wed, 19 December 2007 17:28 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J52iO-0000Dy-3B; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:28:16 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J52iM-0000DQ-GP for ram@iab.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:28:14 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J52iM-0002Xq-78 for ram@iab.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:28:14 -0500
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2007 09:28:13 -0800
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBJHSDVt017976; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:28:13 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id lBJHS1LK011113; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:28:09 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:28:01 -0800
Received: from [171.70.245.32] ([171.70.245.32]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:28:01 -0800
In-Reply-To: <1636F5BF-3424-49F3-98D0-84677EA6D667@muada.com>
References: <8FE686E6-D352-4324-88CC-2C9EC26A5871@extremenetworks.com> <1636F5BF-3424-49F3-98D0-84677EA6D667@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <7E7662ED-8C2B-4912-919A-C43F57DCB539@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] Different approaches for different protocols
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:27:59 -0800
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Dec 2007 17:28:01.0796 (UTC) FILETIME=[81909C40:01C84264]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=334; t=1198085293; x=1198949293; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=tli@cisco.com; z=From:=20Tony=20Li=20<tli@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20Different=20approaches=20for=20 different=20protocols |Sender:=20; bh=2wrsx52e7Xu0R7S+UGl3rhX6RPQ+r2RKuE+6F/36I5M=; b=NuBiTbhoGqzAd16SzV6yYHkHlRSGzfm0LHNBfuOoUBKi5PnM4U3VejvcRe wOllbdFFrlRF0GLzersqozTTRdFbV5Hv8C1XC6jpcRUGX7UG+ZxiuKNVEqFf uXQx8QVlHB;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=tli@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> However, over on the internet area mailinglist Bob Hinden made the  
> case that new work on IPv4 should stop and we should focus on IPv6  
> exclusively and only do the necessary maintenance for IPv4.


I don't think we got rough consensus on that point.

Tony

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram