IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 08 May 2007 20:17 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlW7O-0006XN-SL; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:17:06 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlW7N-0006XI-Is for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:17:05 -0400
Received: from ns.virtualized.org ([204.152.189.134] helo=mail.virtualized.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlW7M-00073k-72 for ram@iab.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:17:05 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ns.virtualized.org [204.152.189.134]) by mail.virtualized.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l48K1FHT067803; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:01:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drc@virtualized.org)
In-Reply-To: <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA470@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <8F47F550-6224-4AFF-8359-CBA98D3F2FAB@muada.com> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA470@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <9C228355-9425-4C66-A9A7-47498490E3B1@virtualized.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:16:58 -0700
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

Hi,

On May 8, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Dave Thaler wrote:
> I disagree with the word "everything".  The two high level choices  
> are:
>
> PULL: work on-demand (which results in deterministic loss and hence
> adversely affects applications) and cache the result for some time

What applications are adversely affected by a delay in transmitting  
the first packet?  How do such applications work in today's "best  
effort" Internet?

Thanks,
-drc




_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email