Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 09 May 2007 07:15 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlgOc-0004O0-P6; Wed, 09 May 2007 03:15:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlgOa-0004Nr-Tf for ram@iab.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 03:15:32 -0400
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlgOZ-00058N-KI for ram@iab.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 03:15:32 -0400
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2007 09:15:31 +0200
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l497FUf8012361; Wed, 9 May 2007 09:15:30 +0200
Received: from adsl-247-5-fixip.tiscali.ch (ams3-vpn-dhcp4517.cisco.com [10.61.81.164]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l497FTlZ017306; Wed, 9 May 2007 07:15:30 GMT
Message-ID: <4641750A.9010906@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 09:15:22 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [RAM] The mapping problem: rendezvous points?
References: <8F47F550-6224-4AFF-8359-CBA98D3F2FAB@muada.com> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA470@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <9C228355-9425-4C66-A9A7-47498490E3B1@virtualized.org> <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC054EA59D@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <86588E66-ACED-4DD2-B286-3DA5B2518B1A@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <86588E66-ACED-4DD2-B286-3DA5B2518B1A@virtualized.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=397; t=1178694930; x=1179558930; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20The=20mapping=20problem=3A=20rendezvous=20poi nts? |Sender:=20; bh=Xv+WQsK6MDXQ2LR8GA2gxx4psNIOV/RbaBMFUQhgkvM=; b=eX0v+T6nPxH/yJ8NeJyMC+TumgbXgT8G/SPb76JM0crzndQ+fHLWC35Ofp0M9TskbVbZVe+p s2keapJ5vwI+WgJkL4wh84xeHB2dgvXgW1cAG0Htc1dhxE/F//Gwt5u6;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

David Conrad wrote:
>
> I was wondering if you had concrete examples of existing applications 
> that would fail with an increase in initial packet latency.

Aside from the fact that Marshall provided such a list, depending on 
where the split happens, if it's not in the host, then no one can 
guarantee that the loss is in fact the first packet, or that it's just 
one packet.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram