Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation
Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 12 September 2007 20:08 UTC
Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVYVu-000140-2v; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:08:42 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVYVr-0000sZ-VS for ram@iab.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:08:39 -0400
Received: from moebius2.space.net ([195.30.1.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVYVq-0000mI-LS for ram@iab.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:08:39 -0400
Received: (qmail 20180 invoked by uid 1007); 12 Sep 2007 20:08:37 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=XapwPJAl0BovOwxBf3YsY18fUPutp0dkM/nwXlMFAjDg9gEpGOkdQNEUaA/Vv0zi ;
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:08:37 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation
Message-ID: <20070912200837.GS69215@Space.Net>
References: <469F7673.6070702@firstpr.com.au> <20070720140433.GA69215@Space.Net> <46A21AD6.2060501@firstpr.com.au> <0857530C-5C9D-4D29-ACAB-16A99CBFD929@muada.com> <46E6992D.2090501@firstpr.com.au> <46E6F514.1030206@gmail.com> <DCE587FE-A4E1-48AB-B378-44A163E2C227@muada.com> <186FA279-5A25-4F50-8CBA-57CD9FDAA925@cisco.com> <4FC2075B-2E11-4C0F-A5CC-0ABAB75E826C@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FC2075B-2E11-4C0F-A5CC-0ABAB75E826C@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>, RAM Mailing List <ram@iab.org>
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org
Hi, I seem to have missed that e-mail. Sorry for replying not in sequence. On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:53:50PM -0700, Dino Farinacci wrote: > >I did a survey about a month ago and it is true. I will yield to > >those folks who responded to me to protect their privacy. ;-) We haven't been asked in this survey - and our data looks quite different. > >o We are going to 9K MTUs on all our internal links. > >o Where we don't have 9K MTUs, we use 4470. > >o Virtually no one runs ISP links at 1500. In nearly all locations we have devices that still have Fast Ethernet links (because upgrading to GigE is expensive and the amount of packes flowing through the link doesn't require it). While we don't run 1500 on links where MPLS is used, most Cisco gear in use cannot go over 1520...1530 on FastEthernet ports. This limits the GigE machines to 1530 as well, as things really break (today) if you share a layer2 segment between machines with different MTUs. So there is no way our network could run on a MTU of 4470 or even higher any time soon. [..] > In practice, this is not really a problem. Hosts typically do not > originate IP packets larger than 1500 bytes. And second, a survey > has been taken (from a list of ISPs, see Acknowledgement section) > where nearly all ISP link MTUs are either 4470 bytes or support > Ethernet jumbo frames of 9000 bytes. Therefore, we don't anticipate > any problems with prepending additional headers. This is handwaving, and not a good basis for research work. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 122119 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ RAM mailing list RAM@iab.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram
- RE: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Templin, Fred L
- [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Robin Whittle
- [RAM] Re: Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [RAM] Re: Tunneling overheads and fragmentati… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RAM] Re: Tunneling overheads and fragmentati… David Meyer
- Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Wassim Haddad
- Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Gert Doering
- Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Robin Whittle
- Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Pekka Savola
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Gert Doering
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Gert Doering
- Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragm… Dino Farinacci