Re: [RAM] First cut at routing & addressing problem statement

> We would welcome comments on the document. In particular:
> 
>  - Do folk agree with the problem statement as written, or are we
>    missing something fairly fundamental?

Yes. I think it's correct to keep it down to the bare bones.

>  - Are there other pressures on the routing system that we have not
>    listed or described completely?

Not that I noticed.

>  - We intentionally did not include improving mobility as a core
>    "problem", as explained in the document. (That doesn't mean we
>    don't recognize that some of the solutions under discussion may
>    also be applicable to mobility scenarios. Rather, we tend to see
>    improved mobility as a possible benefit of certain classes of
>    solutions.)

I think this is correct. In many ways mobility is an overlay
on a routing system assumed to be stable and scaleable.

>  - Are there other views of what folk perceive the core routing and
>    addressing problem to be?

Not here.

     Brian

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram