Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-eat-15.txt

[Thomas Fossati <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the readable diff!

On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 12:18 PM Michael Richardson
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> 4)"This document registers no media or content types for the
>    identification of the type of EAT, its serialization format or
>    security envelope.  That is left for a follow-on document."
>
> I'm okay with this, but maybe to say,
>     That is left for to follow-on documents, or may be defined by
>     by documents that define EAT Profiles.

Or just stick a ref to I-D.ietf-rats-eat-media-type (which, to some
degree, also takes care of profiles.)

> 6) "Each claim defined in this document is added to the $$Claims-Set-
>    Claims socket group. "
>
> The term "socket group" is a CDDL-ism.  I know what it means, but it might be
> confusing to some (pointy haired manager) who don't know what CDDL is.
> It might be worth adding to the terminology section.  I'm not sure here.

It should be enough to add "The terminology from [RFC8610] and
[RFC9165] applies." to Section 2.

-- 
Thomas