IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] IPR statements about draft-ietf-rats-architecture

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 11 November 2021 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075503A1543 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:21:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL=1.31, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSDjl4Rul-WA for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619D53A153E for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A691A18030 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:23:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id x37CuNCaSlrj for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:23:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3997F1802E for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:23:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69377421 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:21:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <13393136-DA37-499E-A22A-ED3F755E1826@cisco.com>
References: <A0549AA5-E660-4322-9C8F-CF2D582CEF04@cisco.com> <1ba63507-059c-e326-f464-753356c7a2b5@sit.fraunhofer.de> <13393136-DA37-499E-A22A-ED3F755E1826@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:21:01 -0500
Message-ID: <16826.1636593661@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/4zI2rZJ2kfUWZHo0PbE5U6g0Fuk>
Subject: Re: [Rats] IPR statements about draft-ietf-rats-architecture
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:21:10 -0000

Nancy Cam-Winget \(ncamwing\) <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > As you note, the shepherd writeup has to include discussion (and
    > conclusion) of the IPR disclosure, NOT of the claims as we are not
    > experts to evaluate them or the validity of any patents.

okay.

In the meantime, could the chairs please request area reviews.
(Last Call is not necessary, nor do we want to wait that long)
The DT lets you ask. Just click "Request Reviews" button.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email