Re: [Rats] WG call for adoption of draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation

["Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <[e-mail]>]

OK, if we wanted to abbreviate it, it could be “Tpm Based Attestation of Network Devices” so the acronym would be TBAND
And the file could be named draft-ietf-rats-tband

Too short and cryptic now??? :-P

From: Laurence Lundblade <[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 8:29 AM
To: Dave Thaler <[e-mail]>
Cc: ncamwing <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Rats] WG call for adoption of draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation

+1.000000000 (a bit long, but OK)

LL


On May 19, 2020, at 8:08 PM, Dave Thaler <dthaler=[e-mail]<mailto:dthaler=[e-mail]>> wrote:

A bit long but ok with me if others are ok with the length.

From: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing=[e-mail]<mailto:ncamwing=[e-mail]>>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:14 PM
To: Dave Thaler <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Rats] WG call for adoption of draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation

Thanks Dave….how about:  draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attestation to be a little more consistant with the title and capture the intent of the document?

From: Dave Thaler <dthaler=[e-mail]<mailto:dthaler=[e-mail]>>
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 6:44 PM
To: ncamwing <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: RE: [Rats] WG call for adoption of draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation

Regarding “please rename the file draft-ietf-rats-network-device-attestation-00”…
The title was changed in response to feedback, by adding “TPM-based” in front.
I would recommend that the title also be similarly clarified by having –tpm- somewhere in the filename.

From: RATS <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> On Behalf Of Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 6:27 PM
To: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing=[e-mail]<mailto:ncamwing=[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Rats] WG call for adoption of draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation

Thank you all who have responded positive on the adoption both on the virtual interim call (for which there was strong consensus) and on the email.

The working group now adopts this draft and we can place it in the RATs WG repository of adopted documents.
Authors, please rename the file draft-ietf-rats-network-device-attestation-00 and provide me your GitHub id’s so I can create the repository
In https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fietf-rats-wg&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7Cda9a71d4909044ffcd5a08d7fc638c0b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637255376798849665&sdata=TyW%2FtOHmon1N9sxACdLZVdxeBwI0KUlZBtXq57vFDXw%3D&reserved=0> and have you move the document there for us to track issues and updates.

Best, Nancy

From: RATS <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing=[e-mail]<mailto:ncamwing=[e-mail]>>
Date: Monday, May 4, 2020 at 4:25 PM
To: "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: [Rats] WG call for adoption of draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation

Hello RATs participants,

This email begins a 2 week adoption call (ending on May 18)

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation/<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7Cda9a71d4909044ffcd5a08d7fc638c0b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637255376798849665&sdata=StR0Z2Lj50%2B4rhAIGQ09si15FpmlslCbknmh70JTZ28%3D&reserved=0>

If you have objections to adopting this draft, please respond by EOD May 18.

Thanks, Nancy

_______________________________________________
RATS mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats