Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-architecture-22.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 28 September 2022 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B24C15E6E7 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56_4FaJ9r2Dm for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1783BC15E6D9 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [185.109.152.24]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACEAF1F455 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:27:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 9A87E1A0749; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: rats@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <95595.1664364890@dooku>
References: <166436062751.48442.14851818426757822967@ietfa.amsl.com> <95595.1664364890@dooku>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> message dated "Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:34:50 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:27:19 +0200
Message-ID: <101277.1664371639@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/7DyyCPh31GoiOHj8un0A2XDzP2c>
Subject: Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-architecture-22.txt
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:27:24 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    >> Title : Remote Attestation Procedures Architecture Authors : Henk
    >> Birkholz Dave Thaler Michael Richardson Ned Smith Wei Pan Filename :
    >> draft-ietf-rats-architecture-22.txt Pages : 57 Date : 2022-09-28

    > ...

    >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
    >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rats-architecture-22

    > I have dealt with all of the IESG COMMENTS that I was able to.  I don't
    > know how to improve Figure 3 for Paul.  If someone else has an idea,
    > please say so.

absent any good ideas, I consider the document ready to go to the RFC editor.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-