[Rats] I-D Action: draft-birkholz-rats-uccs-01.txt

[Laurence Lundblade <[e-mail]>]

Perfectly in favor of the UCCS tag.

The security discussion in this seems like the tail wagging the dog. UCCS is the tail. Conveyance Security is the dog. 

I think this draft should only say it is up to you to attach a dog to this tail.  CWT’s are a dog+tail so you don’t have to worry. UCCS is tail-only so you do. Your choice of dog is of course up to you. Choose wisely.  

Note also that UCCS is useful if you don’t like the type of dog that CWT comes with. It allows you use different types of dogs with a CWT-style tail.

:-)

Or said another way, I’m not so much in favor of section 3. Anything about RATS / EAT security should be in RATS / EAT docs, not here. Would like the draft to say simply “Be warned. UCCS does not have the security that CWT does. If you use UCCS, you should add security”.

LL