Re: [Rats] Call for adoption (after draft rename) for Yang module draft

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07331200A4 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:24:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Tm0uer_cU4T for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa06-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F2212004A for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.122.0.182] ([45.56.150.85]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPA id SRqhipu38MfejSRqhiAHT6; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:24:15 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
In-Reply-To: <ce5f8206-74dc-36bb-0093-a93045d5c67f@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:24:14 -0800
Cc: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A7E3A4F-8534-4E98-BCB7-1454E07699F4@island-resort.com>
References: <8B173958-FC2A-4D1D-A81C-F324AB632CD7@cisco.com> <147F9159-6055-4E55-ABDC-43DFE3498BF1@island-resort.com> <ce5f8206-74dc-36bb-0093-a93045d5c67f@sit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIwOCKQq91rRzmP0A5sxwlZjH8LsKzbgkApRn6ZFEcY191fbB9gxmn1UuxE8JHq/o5kh7Jt0Xv4pq46obkzeDIQVStWTk+Ziaztc+z81mmjp6AVemqjF uf9fXcY5x2r+jfMpp0ohLdup6VuVpjERF3UrTFayRzSInpp2bUyICLpjjAEynU/0uR4EeofQZZJ0W6LZzT2alqvrsZgq5wcG7N9cXBbS0wQs3qSP/bSNQDKu EmxNiXlZGadOTIvBjXAHCQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/INB-IwbllFidUP0-nEu9IiVZq_s>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Call for adoption (after draft rename) for Yang module draft
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 20:24:18 -0000

For a version of it that carries EATs, the current name, YANG Module for Basic Challenge-Response-based Remote Attestation Procedures, draft-birkholz-rats-basic-yang-module-01 is fine IMO.

LL

> On Nov 6, 2019, at 12:10 PM, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> 
> And bad sequence of replies, too...
> 
> Does that have an impact on the title? I think it does not. Laurence?
> 
> Viele Grüße,
> 
> Henk
> 
> On 06.11.19 20:44, Laurence Lundblade wrote:
>> I think we have accepted that this WG will do standardization for / around the following attestation token formats (aka attestation evidence formats):
>>  * EAT (lots of detailed work in IETF to define)
>>      o JWT
>>      o CWT
>>      o (possibly also ASN.1 / X.509)
>>  * TCG (fixed years ago by the TCG)
>>      o TPM 1.2 signed Quote
>>      o TPM 2 signed Audit Session
>> I think any conveyance protocol we work on MUST carry all of these. I don’t think this is hard. If it were hard I wouldn’t say this.
>> To adopt the YANG module, I think it should be modified to carry EAT/JWT/CWT and retain its name. It can still have the other TPM-specific stuff in it for use when in TPM mode, but it should have an EAT mode too.
>> LL
>>> On Nov 5, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing@cisco.com <mailto:ncamwing@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> Thanks for the feedback and responses received thus far on thehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birkholz-rats-basic-yang-module/
>>> draft.
>>> There  was consensus that the focus of the draft is more about TPM based attestations so the draft should be modified accordingly.  A suggested title would be “Yang Module for TPM based Remote Attestations”, the file, once adopted, would be renamed to draf -rats-tpm-yang-module
>>> With this proposed update, this is a call for adoption for that draft with the modified name.  We would like to close the confirmation by the Friday of the IETF 106, e.g. Friday Nov 22 EOD (IETF time).  If you have objections on adopting the draft, please state your rationale as well.
>>> Warm regards,
>>>                 Nancy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RATS mailing list
>>> RATS@ietf.org <mailto:RATS@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>> _______________________________________________
>> RATS mailing list
>> RATS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats