[Rats] Re: UCCS and EAT media types (was: Re: Re: AD follow-up review of draft-ietf-rats-uccs-09)

Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@linaro.org> Fri, 07 June 2024 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.fossati@linaro.org>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401FEC15152B for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 19:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvTjTcnVA0C9 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 19:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72DF2C14CE3B for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 19:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52962423ed8so1955144e87.2 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 19:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1717727234; x=1718332034; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fVWqAoTnK/0vLdZstelmohEgDCFQ2d4hmDoGr1qI4UA=; b=hih/ajkpRE8w/M/8QswtHXH3FsCSxH/G/HZFmMc/LREvoU14Z8CnAho1uUkd8RhgS6 I8jF+/ZKgS+hb4EErfNGAIOIUA+Y3FW++/+mNLVFu6xEj5KPGZIB0J0bnb2XcaQYnuo2 tO9hhd+T5dn05R+2naOzTnqjCU4Dy4UtXoA55Y9fH92jBqMbAVx/7nE6aJLl0R5/e9dT JHMSlsoJx11KXBb43hk1pOcMq9/uVhA4RgtS6Anwr0HLarCbA9DPrZo4XG9jOGRR1maL fyAca0B1TXa46G4MVqRLsbcQ1zn842muFTngOeCVV1V66pVtg5b4ynAT6QImNxkB6kMe OPyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717727234; x=1718332034; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fVWqAoTnK/0vLdZstelmohEgDCFQ2d4hmDoGr1qI4UA=; b=mR75groMbDTpETMrjI8qjBIxNWFe3oYCnDnVM57o7TCjty4HLk5SBuShIdMDVCWPUt a1Udkw9JZxX0xBczvG3g/7cxtvdPa4yXUGzyH5+d4kpbod3JBqW69GXyw4tz7hDaXTx+ C+t6rlQXzboGCACrfEq/1JXSCeCwMb1z9ajHiinIqT36MOqCfrcB4ZvDBd5LiRg821Ua grSW2PtQK7TctLC1p1YST07og+1I/6+9umiQYdy9lC4DNI5GkMNX/ZnwBXy/vhNeEGDD NaZPqaQ4j6/XEr9kE5qWFj72sr6iyO4e4r9gM+x8cLTUDR+nOdbzw1z65fV9HFo7H6pL ZHrQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVxqlKL+V3sUu+ja361SYr0Do/eVtBmBG3j0ldLZFraSrm+nWq0Ci7e3UsSzR1LrYPF/OLLQD37qCXNYvZD
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyPpGOmVluhJmpX2YG0KabGT22FuAZn3zbdRQfUvbcNhubqGNep 46WeDvylgV40zUUX+kS9rKlEaM//BllkrudBvEGI4euZ6qifP/TohycmuvavcNiYAyEPwdQqls7 5WEZrKs7JvJ1b2VYuE4T08G3l7Vh29iFfUk6hRbjlifdSYMqgrYU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGoK87AAVzcSrmk0lRyfCgcyvLaYoihzcG19+S2/8ENznFFXf0Zg3112devaos0W4eJmfSLy5zL14AWToCqu7U=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9187:0:b0:2ea:83d1:4802 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2eadce3e25fmr7471681fa.27.1717727234218; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH1P110MB1116C5BE031039613AA69302DC2DA@PH1P110MB1116.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <609017C0-5043-46A1-81B1-6835F4BD6FF9@tzi.org> <CA+1=6ydAVSbKmphfiFiukv2m7tpkgsZ3RUsqcQW1QRZeMc9_qA@mail.gmail.com> <6E22DA74-DF3A-48ED-AC30-CCEFB4816A05@tzi.org> <849942bd-a013-cbba-76a0-c4a51624bdfa@ietf.contact>
In-Reply-To: <849942bd-a013-cbba-76a0-c4a51624bdfa@ietf.contact>
From: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 19:26:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+1=6yfAiGpR9Z7EG73iV0bCh2_Ana-yM7YUuONhhs2_rZS2og@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID-Hash: CHBNXG2X3HRHHNXUP62CIZJDPJJPBHYJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: CHBNXG2X3HRHHNXUP62CIZJDPJJPBHYJ
X-MailFrom: thomas.fossati@linaro.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rats.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rats] Re: UCCS and EAT media types (was: Re: Re: AD follow-up review of draft-ietf-rats-uccs-09)
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/MlLrrMsdLe1RSSbVQwFasZwjFag>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rats-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rats-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rats-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Henk,

On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 05:29, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> wrote:
> it is perfectly fine to define useful informative CDDL definitions in an
> Appendix (that we have to mark as informative) and then let other
> specification use that definition in an informative or normative manner.
>
> It is also very useful :-)

I agree it's useful.
(I am not 100% convinced an appendix can only contain informative
stuff, but if that is the case then be it.)

> I do not think that removing the UJCS
> reference from draft-ietf-rats-eat-media-type is useful or necessary,

The problem, at the moment, is there seems to be no anchoring document for UJCS.

I have the following proposal:

1. We remove types for UCCS and UJCS from the EAT media-types document
and only define types for CWT, JWT, BUN-J, BUN-C.

2. The UCCS document defines the (EAT) media type for UCCS (we can do
a simple transplant from EAT m-t).

3. A new, separate UJCS document is spawned that references the CDDL
in Appendix C of UCCS to normatively define UJCS and its (EAT) media
type (again, a simple transplant from EAT m-t).

What do you think?

cheers, t