Re: [Rats] [Suit] draft-moran-suit-mud, EAT and MUD

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6066B3A0DB0; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aA3YxN6HcQ7o; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36EEF3A0D54; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1233; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1592836986; x=1594046586; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=WqJdOYFFh2vYOJsLjb3cjW3rOgAgwy9ZHWedBsGT9OM=; b=VzLHhMrYY2Yzg2AH2bqHZeIoSSYACW999eX1tatOY/ZaOlEEhHa7HfTi M8uZaNU7gWzL2B6/bai4j8VNghDXXeD+gr7NlbDurjakyaXZpMdh/uWy2 X3IelQuE/VFGdnghm6q1nUjW+AjMedmKUynGmU7P1PvEgf9x11sURe3Eg Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CNAwCnwvBe/xbLJq1mHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGCCoIqgUMBIBIshCSJAYgMm34EBwEBAQkDAQEvBAEBhEAHAoIsJTgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVnhXIBAQEBAgEjVgULCxgqAgJXBhODJgGCXCC1TnaBMoVRhRMQgTiBU4sqggCBESccgk0+h1Ezgi0EmhaaPYJkgwKBJpUBAx2CXwGcG6wkg08CBAYFAhWBaiKBVjMaCBsVZQGCPj4SGQ2cZz8DMDcCBgEHAQEDCZBkAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,267,1589241600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="27340009"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 Jun 2020 14:43:02 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-111-164.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-111-164.cisco.com [10.61.111.164]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MEh1Hv027450 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:43:01 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <4BE0A1F6-D474-4AEA-AF2B-6C67A1A37F5F@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F3B85A6A-45E4-412D-A6C2-8C286D23BB89"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:43:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <A82744C1-2D46-4F26-956D-CF0B88627967@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, draft-moran-suit-mud@ietf.org, suit <suit@ietf.org>, rats@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <12373.1592169791@localhost> <A82744C1-2D46-4F26-956D-CF0B88627967@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.111.164, dhcp-10-61-111-164.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/P7E4KFNUluByP4qW80TVQCRuJWs>
Subject: Re: [Rats] [Suit] draft-moran-suit-mud, EAT and MUD
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:43:14 -0000

I think that’s a fine answer.

> On 22 Jun 2020, at 16:21, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I think that the best way forward is to ask SECDISPATCH.  I do not think SUIT is a bad answer, but we have a process to pick.
> 
> Russ