Re: [Rats] IPR check for draft-ietf-rats-architecture

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Tue, 20 September 2022 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555B8C1524D3 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YhfM0PtxIU97 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C54C1524C0 for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:420:c0f8:1002::144] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0f8:1002:0:0:0:144]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 28KG0VwV1816825 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:00:34 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1663689634; bh=VXPqiss4d8rejwS2T90CGTz6eZLXjGc6WjOsLD2MIM8=; h=Date:To:References:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=pKvj325os7vccEzMJ0yuC0iwO3GvmybMunc0IegEmQRrWBma0c0r49QK8X+WmlOWB z33KzNUei0mdP8d0iIRldBP9/1M5CkswHU1GwL1gUG8cQiTbeS0S8tuOdLYK2GpiEK Le923I+g818MUFU5IO7uW8P2frJtuq7DwDcU8HAw=
Message-ID: <2ee4e0fd-3e80-ecb4-1cca-7a301cedfeca@lear.ch>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:00:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
References: <BN2P110MB110700AC2C8A6C5DB916DDFDDC4C9@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB110700AC2C8A6C5DB916DDFDDC4C9@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------VysjW5qA5qbA6oJ3BTUaHo6Z"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/Pm1sKHBJH0lPL9pBIXgnmSi2YuQ>
Subject: Re: [Rats] IPR check for draft-ietf-rats-architecture
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:00:47 -0000

Roman,

While it's better that they be made than not, the timing of these 
disclosures is disappointing.

Eliot


On 20.09.22 16:31, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> draft-ietf-rats-architecture was reviewed by the IESG at the September 9 telechat.  Based on this IESG evaluation, the document was advanced to the "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed" state -- the document is approved for publication, but I'm requesting that the authors review the IESG COMMENTs and publish a revision.
>
> Since this document left the WG and went through IESG evaluation, another set of IPR claims against this document have been reported (on September 16).  See:
>
> -- https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5812/
> -- https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5811/
>
> Note, these are different that the two IPR claims we previously discussed (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/3nCTOkNYW8ydEo0zHZlQoY8F92A/).
>
> Since this document is now sitting with me for advancement, I am consulting the WG if there are any objections to publishing this document (once another revision is published) given this new IPR information.  Please respond to the list by Wednesday, September 28, 2022.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>