Re: [Rats] where did the architecture go?
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 08 November 2021 21:50 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C183A0C86 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:50:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDx8wTSzeSS0 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:49:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899623A0C85 for <rats@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:49:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1A8LnlHM008038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:49:54 -0500
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:49:47 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20211108214947.GV37437@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CAObGJnMnUdgpThXy4Dph9JgDt5w6ks6PaZsxd4C1Msbqoa8s-g@mail.gmail.com> <8488FC0A-9BD4-471B-ADD7-965640247F00@intel.com> <309063.1636405052@dooku>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <309063.1636405052@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/S7nrEz3zeAAwGteQiAPp_zrAMHM>
Subject: Re: [Rats] where did the architecture go?
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:50:02 -0000
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:57:32PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > 2) a bunch of stuff went from having "foo" -> foo in the txt version. > Equations in the epoch area. I think that this is a change in the tooling. I think there's been some churn in the tooling's rendering of <tt> elements, yes. -Ben
- [Rats] where did the architecture go? Thomas Fossati
- Re: [Rats] where did the architecture go? Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] where did the architecture go? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Rats] where did the architecture go? Benjamin Kaduk