IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] AD Review of draft-ietf-rats-architecture-15

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 23 July 2022 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C153EC14F742 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0aI006Cdtq8 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDA36C157B3E for <rats@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (dhcp-886b.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.136.107]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D971F459 for <rats@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 22:24:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 70D001A0383; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 18:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <33343.1658604777@dooku>
References: <BN2P110MB110748C2C81E515E5E7277C5DCC09@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3256.1651680451@localhost> <dabb272d-1e69-8a0e-ba91-4d5d85cfb8ab@sandelman.ca> <BN2P110MB11077E3694C78ACBA39F2F3ADC919@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <33343.1658604777@dooku>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> message dated "Sat, 23 Jul 2022 15:32:57 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 18:24:43 -0400
Message-ID: <45465.1658615083@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/SbCIRwJo-7I0iFIgbY97Tow5QxY>
Subject: Re: [Rats] AD Review of draft-ietf-rats-architecture-15
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 22:24:52 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > I really don't think section 5 is that mysterious that it needs more
    > introduction.  I would really like some more opinions from the WG.

The design team has prepared a few slides to deal with this question.
It would be very useful if people could review Roman's comments at:
  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/K_sU1kLQybiywE1nax9SJRgw_UI
and the text at:
  https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rats-architecture-18.html#name-topological-patterns

And consider if we have adequately described the interactions for Attestation
Results (Passport model), and Evidence (Background check).

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email