Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-eat-15.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 02 October 2022 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD20C1524BB for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 05:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KUDEqFJ0MkYE for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 05:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3036EC1524BA for <rats@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 05:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2a02:3032:40a:77ae:42bd:494b:bc4a:be52]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E89F1F459; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 12:05:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id F25CD1A0758; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 14:05:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: rats@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CAObGJnNwuuMLRhPa9xTW1b-OY19zLcpJqj9dreowPXsxtNJcvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <166466905854.59321.12818330000633725430@ietfa.amsl.com> <869853.1664709443@dooku> <CAObGJnNwuuMLRhPa9xTW1b-OY19zLcpJqj9dreowPXsxtNJcvA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com> message dated "Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:43:46 +0100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 14:05:42 +0200
Message-ID: <996453.1664712342@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/TTjF4tnF-YcQ6yXnhffrVXcv5aw>
Subject: Re: [Rats] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-eat-15.txt
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:05:49 -0000

Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> The term "socket group" is a CDDL-ism.  I know what it means, but it might be
    >> confusing to some (pointy haired manager) who don't know what CDDL is.
    >> It might be worth adding to the terminology section.  I'm not sure here.

    > It should be enough to add "The terminology from [RFC8610] and
    > [RFC9165] applies." to Section 2.

maybe:

socket group: This is a term from [RFC8610] and [RFC9165], and refers to
       the technical mechanism by which CDDL is extended.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-