IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] Agenda Requests

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8E6120909 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJotuNajvIgz for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa06-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0D1120908 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.122.0.122] ([45.56.150.85]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPA id PsVbi3lvYMRj5PsVci2k8g; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:15:53 -0700
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Message-Id: <7E2A796B-7F7F-4994-972F-01B12918FC19@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3464C22C-9F9E-4269-B5AE-9F75FC88C3D9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:15:51 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH5MG+Xf0kh3f+i4ituL=rVWBPuqxRfET=DjGPrg-MkU+A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: rats@ietf.org
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH5MG+Xf0kh3f+i4ituL=rVWBPuqxRfET=DjGPrg-MkU+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIkHqnXygrM2cp73Knuj5FL4hkqTPzDRIrSub42lFdnzxX3xtn4Q42AR9iiBVNnAL4MryPSPtxY9XBFcPwRl0Z9YQ1RInXtSb+L6wofZJweEunS0fAxd mykjca9wSFE63W5X/SBRLPSRvHwOA+DqwLw/IS7vEx7EiUAEFtiTSVx4ykuKYyJ8rZUAetu16Kh/6OApyRMynudIzdCkW3pfQp4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/U7-2UVxIsXPtRM06Jtaiz8j7HF4>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Agenda Requests
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:15:55 -0000

I’d like to request 60 minutes to work on current open EAT issues:

Detailed discussion on submods and nesting. 
Boot state / debug as levels, not Booleans <https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/36> (goal is to assign someone from Arm and Intel to review).
OEMID Clarifications PR <https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/41> 
UEID size PR <https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/35>
CWT cti, JWT jti and nonce claim <https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/42>
Claim optionality. <https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/issues/23> Should only be confirmation this can be closed.
Claim characteristics PR <https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/7>. Relates to above. 

Follow links to GitHub for details (and comment sooner rather than later if you can).

I’d also like to request 30 minutes in Singapore to discuss when or whether we work on the following:

Software Inventory claims
Measurement and integrity claims
Public key claims

These seem like very important claims to me for core use cases and EAT would be only half-useful without them, but they will be hard work and take time and thus likely to push EAT into late 2020 or 2021. 

I know I’m asking for a lot of time (maybe it isn’t possible). My reasons are:
I would like to see EAT complete sooner (2020) rather than later (2021…)
Engagement and comments on the EAT claims have been light; it’s not clear there is consensus on many EAT claims
I think EAT can make a lot of progress in parallel with architecture, but that isn’t happening so much 

Thanks

LL



> On Oct 28, 2019, at 7:36 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Greetings!
> 
> This is an official call for agenda items.  We have received some and will be sorting through those to post soon, but would like to make an official call for agenda items.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email