Re: [Rats] Call for adoption (after draft rename) for Yang module draft

"Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com> Sat, 23 November 2019 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.smith@intel.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E9E12004F for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:16:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a58ts6ztUW5d for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F2A8120024 for <rats@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:16:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Nov 2019 11:16:40 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,234,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="409215306"
Received: from orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.128]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2019 11:16:40 -0800
Received: from orsmsx155.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.21) by ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:16:40 -0800
Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.161]) by ORSMSX155.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.211]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:16:39 -0800
From: "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Rats] Call for adoption (after draft rename) for Yang module draft
Thread-Index: AQHVlCwI8/lytau3hU+AhCwtIdg/0ad/EtmAgAAHhgCAAAO0AIAGacyAgAAGuoCAAJAygIAAL78AgAEETQCAAqU5AIACdRAAgAyAhACAAE8NAA==
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 19:16:38 +0000
Message-ID: <8363AFEC-C92C-466D-8F2C-CE7A3E94370B@intel.com>
References: <8B173958-FC2A-4D1D-A81C-F324AB632CD7@cisco.com> <147F9159-6055-4E55-ABDC-43DFE3498BF1@island-resort.com> <ce5f8206-74dc-36bb-0093-a93045d5c67f@sit.fraunhofer.de> <0A7E3A4F-8534-4E98-BCB7-1454E07699F4@island-resort.com> <C3AE2645-49C8-4313-BCED-02FEB576B614@cisco.com> <1C8A1884-A37D-45E3-8C11-2FC5A083B245@island-resort.com> <HE1PR0702MB375366C5F7FE5C497C35D73B8F740@HE1PR0702MB3753.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <7106C9D3-8ED1-419E-81F8-4CDA799BEDAE@intel.com> <MWHPR21MB07844F61BEFAE03F9E7DD290A3770@MWHPR21MB0784.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <6E7D64B4-2049-4D0A-ADC5-CA3F0647779B@island-resort.com> <MWHPR21MB07840B6CF7BEE0A11ABE54BFA3700@MWHPR21MB0784.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <10511.1574490818@dooku.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <10511.1574490818@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1f.0.191110
x-originating-ip: [10.251.148.166]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9305E8FF80DBF842989991FD0B33A97E@intel.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/VaMjDL0gkFYa_7X4JCQpCkpGgQM>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Call for adoption (after draft rename) for Yang module draft
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 19:16:43 -0000

The step-0 protocol may have payload size or timing limitations that prevents fully attesting. This is the case for 802.1X ethernet ports. 

On 11/22/19, 10:33 PM, "RATS on behalf of Michael Richardson" <rats-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

        > discoverable by the Verifier.   That step could have included the EAT
        > or the TPM data
    
    I have a todo item to write up:
      1) a use case for Attestation at BSKI onboarding time.
         (really this is a RIV sub-case, I think)
    
      2) a document explaining how to carry EAT in BRSKI voucher-requests and
         RFC8366 vouchers.