IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rats] draft-ietf-rats-architecture-10.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 09 February 2021 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EDA3A07C8 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:11:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25gLq1TqvifS for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C38063A0652 for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A79838A7C for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:14:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7zIdtQ6h2Dzm for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:14:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E645238A78 for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:14:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D24D34A for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:11:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: rats@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <161288612716.18679.17350521680120657746@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <161288612716.18679.17350521680120657746@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:11:35 -0500
Message-ID: <25076.1612905095@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/e0QYhqWO0MxmZHWx654AB5vrHtw>
Subject: [Rats] draft-ietf-rats-architecture-10.txt
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:11:40 -0000

internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-architecture/

    > There is also an HTML version available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rats-architecture-10.html

    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rats-architecture-10

The design team closed a few remaining issues and pull requests.
Two pull requests turned out to fix the same text, so we needed to be sure we
really liked the text we chose.

On issue #208, wontfix:
https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/architecture/issues/208
7.2 -- Attester

We discussed the issue of how the RP trusts that the Verifier is operating
correctly.  (Who Verifies the Verifier?)
This does not lead to architecting a "unitary Verifier/Relying-Party
somewhere in the chain", as the roles can still be split out.
When we dealt with the "mutual attestation" issue, in
   https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/architecture/pull/268
we changed text that has relevance to this issue.

We have no issues open. No pull requests.
If the Shepherd hasn't already started, then they should please start.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.20.1 | Report a Bug | By Email