[Rats] AD review comments/resolution for Architecture

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 28 July 2022 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF30C157B5A for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 06:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t3pqlTrL253r for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 06:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8250C15948A for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 06:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (dhcp-90d1.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.144.209]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C161F448 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:05:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id BF2DF1A05CE; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:05:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: rats@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:05:30 -0400
Message-ID: <438929.1659013530@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/jwA8OnUFpcyvPaCoXVoQiUaBXtI>
Subject: [Rats] AD review comments/resolution for Architecture
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:05:35 -0000

https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/architecture/pull/428

+ As explained in {{overview}}, artifacts are defined by which role elements
+ produce them or consume them.
+ Other role elements may forward, pass-through, cache or repeat artifacts.

I wonder if I missed something else, watching the recording.
This seems too simple to me :-)

The recording does not include the slides, except where Nancy screen shared!
The chair comments mostly did not get into the mic.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-