IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 31 May 2022 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B077FC159529 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2022 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.708
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.708 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXfNvg557l_I for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2022 08:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166B0C157B44 for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2022 08:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88FC3913A; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:04:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id t8HRHba5hQ0E; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED1B39134; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1654013062; bh=v/iXNYkEhW0w5GHYo6q93ISsFBp9VWKZz0EudJUwhwg=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=MxNmmUbY5xtjcuD7igeeV9RNHcyahfLHNLi6qS0l+JZlENmNlP238KfVdWldp1EPx cTCEqpFTupLh5TtlZX5SyMnX0ffVNS2zsm5Ou0+NS0IXJc5fObxKuSOkQq9ueZC/6l NftKP7Wqp1WURTSxQTYbDDT5cprQ5+c8ibM3x949i57krLZkKUR8EiOy5ykyAO721c ei3AH8TX/GKqOHE8Olc/qGPahwHAByTGPmgJJ9TbBbyCNH3zeDM6FMh6bUw8Ou0TYB v/KwlbU0rs+xZk9TZgISLEA9eEh/2HEfj6zuN37nA36NGuk0RGlmjhGBWx6S6W/r6r RnoMNTsPwJ8CA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F882B2; Tue, 31 May 2022 11:49:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>, "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, rats@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <ABA17640-E39E-4545-9A09-75035D6A5297@gmail.com>
References: <DB9PR08MB652413CB8A59912A337BD6859CDC9@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <ABA17640-E39E-4545-9A09-75035D6A5297@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 11:49:33 -0400
Message-ID: <2981.1654012173@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/npyQgk8Vppjch9oQLW-VCCWSBxo>
Subject: Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 15:49:40 -0000

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> That's great.  Just wondering: is there a reason for not triggering all area
    >> reviews?  I think the more reviewers (from different angles) the better.
    >> cheers!

    > That will happen after it goes to the IESG. The IETF last call is part of that process.

We can and should ask for (early) area reviews at any point.

Waiting until IETF Last call just makes it all take longer, and results in
conflicting comments.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status