Re: [Rats] RATS Architecture comments
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 02 December 2020 22:47 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368933A15A1
for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:47:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id XMdRSLD6pnmg for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39323A15A9
for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca
(cpe788a207f397a-cmbc4dfb96bb50.sdns.net.rogers.com [174.116.121.43])
by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED601F45D;
Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:47:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179)
id 16FF71A02BA; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:47:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dooku (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154FE1A026C;
Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:47:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Guy Fedorkow <gfedorkow@juniper.net>, rats@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <BLAPR05MB7378C0F52CD8F3723A6E90CEBAFB0@BLAPR05MB7378.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BLAPR05MB7378C0F52CD8F3723A6E90CEBAFB0@BLAPR05MB7378.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Guy Fedorkow <gfedorkow@juniper.net>
message dated "Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:43:48 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:47:26 -0500
Message-ID: <693471.1606949246@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/o1TYnST50AK36B8f9L91y3a1gqo>
Subject: Re: [Rats] RATS Architecture comments
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>,
<mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>,
<mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 22:47:35 -0000
Hi Guy, I made about 30 issue tickets about your document this week. We dealt with a few of them on Tuesday. We'll summarize things we don't understand or think that we won't fix in email, and the rest you'll see in the diff. Subscribe to the issues/ticket if you want more details :-) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- Re: [Rats] RATS Architecture comments Michael Richardson
- Re: [Rats] RATS Architecture comments Michael Richardson