Re: [Rats] [ietf-rats-wg/eat] Appendix A.1.7 contains too long lines (Issue #288)
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 23 September 2022 09:30 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895C8C14F74A for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VjOx5Ne-l3SI for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EAD0C14CEFC for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (sulu.imp.fu-berlin.de [160.45.114.22]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABBF01F4A4 for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 09:30:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A4EB31A05FE; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:30:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: rats@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <ietf-rats-wg/eat/issues/288/1255470667@github.com>
References: <ietf-rats-wg/eat/issues/288@github.com> <ietf-rats-wg/eat/issues/288/1255470667@github.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Laurence Lundblade <notifications@github.com> message dated "Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:41:36 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:30:24 +0200
Message-ID: <76503.1663925424@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/o8uP_A3qPa0szqf0qKS3sVZwjDs>
Subject: Re: [Rats] [ietf-rats-wg/eat] Appendix A.1.7 contains too long lines (Issue #288)
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 09:30:30 -0000
Laurence Lundblade <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Yup. Been on my list. Thanks for the helpful reference. Will leave this > open until we get them all fixed. Assume this is non-blocking for WGLC. Actually, it makes it EXTREMELY hard to review changes. It's a blocker to getting all the other blockers fixed. So actually I would suggest that you post a -15 document which is IDENTICAL to the -14 document, but has all those lines fixed. (This should be easy to do with ten minutes of git branching) > Some of this comes from the examples and such being in separate files > that are included. Having them in separate files is really good for the > CDDL validation. Probably the document makefile and scripts needs to > implement something from RFC8792. Sure, so you need a awk/perl/sed script to wrap things. If you need help on that, then please say so. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- Re: [Rats] [ietf-rats-wg/eat] Appendix A.1.7 cont… Michael Richardson