Re: [Rats] About current RATS drafts

[H Y <[e-mail]>]

Hi Henk, Laurence,

Thank you for confirming my understandings. Your comments really help me to
read current drafts. :-)

Thanks,
Yuhei

2019年11月1日(金) 23:25 Laurence Lundblade <[e-mail]>:

> Hello,
>
> A frame up that works for me is to think about 1) the claims, the
> attestation format and its details and 2) the transport / conveyance and
> its details.
>
> In the TPM/TCG world the claims and attestation format is locked down by
> what TPM chips do today. It is a set of registers that hold hash values
> used to measure software.  In the EAT world, which typically implements on
> fully functional CPUs, the claims and attestation format is not at all
> locked down and our work is to define it (the eat draft).
>
> A lot of the network and router folks have been putting TPMs into their
> routers and now need a way to get the TPM output off the router to the
> network management center. This world runs off of Yang protocols. The main
> interest there is a very specific Yang-based way to move TPM output. This
> is the yang, tuda and pubsub drafts.
>
> The EAT use cases are more about TEE’s and lining up with
> end-user-application-oriented uses like FIDO and the Android key store.
> They make use of all the existing transports used by application protocol
> (mainly HTTP) so there’s no worry about defining transport.
>
> I think a few of us see EAT as the more general and flexible attestation
> format that will eventually replace the TPM format. Because EAT can use
> CBOR and COSE which are carefully designed for constrained devices there is
> some hope that it can go into TPM-like HW.
>
> The architecture draft is trying to tie the two together in a sort of
> unified field theory. Seems possible, but hard to me.
>
> LL
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 5:08 AM, H Y <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Yuhei Hayashi, network security researcher of NTT in Japan. I
> learned about the existence of RATS WG at IETF 105.
>
> I'm interested in the work of RATS WG and I'm trying to understand it.
> So, I'm firstly trying to understand which drafts contain the
> standards listed in the charter.
>
> I will attach the result of organizing it from my own point of view.
> I'm glad if you confirm that my understanding is correct, if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Yuhei
> --
> ----------------------------------
> Yuuhei HAYASHI
> [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------
> <RATS_drafts.pdf>_______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>
>
>

-- 
----------------------------------
Yuuhei HAYASHI
08065300884
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
----------------------------------