[Rats] 答复: Moving forward with Architecture work

"Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com> Fri, 08 November 2019 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B7212006E for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:16:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUPfrELr5O6F for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6639120018 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:16:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B425F7EBD12FEE852616 for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:16:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:16:41 +0000
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:16:41 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:16:40 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([]) by DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:16:35 +0800
From: "Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
To: Guy Fedorkow <gfedorkow=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
CC: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Moving forward with Architecture work
Thread-Index: AQHVlPE2T+0ud1jmNUmYUaZcS0SF16d/1WRggAC1NtA=
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:16:35 +0000
Message-ID: <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F13EA113EF@dggemm511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <8333BFA8-C457-4710-A7A1-EFF185D304F0@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB4248B4A1DDB3BF856EB8B2A7BA780@BYAPR05MB4248.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB4248B4A1DDB3BF856EB8B2A7BA780@BYAPR05MB4248.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F13EA113EFdggemm511mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/qA_dNmHKtRPLMJq7Ie1UOYtDrgk>
Subject: [Rats] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogTW92aW5nIGZvcndhcmQgd2l0aCBBcmNoaXRl?= =?gb2312?b?Y3R1cmUgd29yaw==?=
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 02:16:46 -0000

Yes, I agrees with this way fully.

And I am willing to contribute to the architecture related work if possible, like: we have open discussion, conf call or other means.

发件人: RATS [mailto:rats-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Guy Fedorkow
发送时间: 2019年11月7日 23:27
收件人: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing@cisco.com>
抄送: rats@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Rats] Moving forward with Architecture work

  I think that’s a great way to move forward on this

Juniper Business Use Only
From: RATS <rats-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rats-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 5:26 PM
To: rats@ietf.org<mailto:rats@ietf.org>
Subject: [Rats] Moving forward with Architecture work

RATS Participants,
We continue to have good discussion on architecture draft content but now have two drafts that will be hard to get consensus on either one.  With each draft providing good benefits, we propose to create a new architecture editorial team to come up with a converged draft that addresses the readability concerns, use cases and terminology discussed thus far. Michael Richardson,  Henk, Dave Thaler and Ned have agreed to be this team and will work on putting out a converged draft soon.

Discussions are still encouraged to ensure all use case scenarios and workflows are considered; but wanted to ensure we had a targeted team to come up with a single proposed architecture document.

Warm regards,  Nancy and Kathleen