Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com> Thu, 02 June 2022 13:13 UTC
Return-Path: <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEE8C15AAE0 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com header.b=PjtI1zBQ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com header.b=PjtI1zBQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onZgIiIa7Jfe for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur04on062a.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe0d::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C53C15AAC1 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=a5DrU+9tmvko/wRuVIkaUE112PKwqhJITmUwGURbTJfCXJzwTbNwnR5a7bEPdXu9fy8WD5rRiOfi/ut4lnue+2pszipjfL3c6yN2W3dlpNSalfDFhKIcG+b1a9ohP4tacoxi83GCVLGqiPT68Ey5AyDVHQX6nADLuT/tnTNAEKP6pQQ9fKvP1SUBVpZ0oczAoRzjr9K22pJiTo0UrlO77oYtZrQusBWseF8q57eE6SC9NAW6HT2tKVAWaKvtIDbdl6/3Qj+g5OS2g3m8Kz0e3mBCjbuA1yU0zt84BireTy5kLDipRC+jOkwSNBCPI0PQdrSIeEMKakBT7GX8koBE/g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=9l9rtxD/XX6tzlWZr2oKtx6BYZmR+7D08/sRMIWWc70=; b=BKePHSkjXFb9qnyFHHT5ozIE3dSovIhasEF8CjCLk2ZzERmlqcXlhaJECxacqdHH22jz694frm3TD9pyYsFXfxSmXNgC0j362UPLVRUs1Rj07CTUsGnQi5cqolkshWGDq99fYmhQK1mzxJNfjKMWeWJpJnDvSR0EGj0J/eFxciBr9imtNlAFH9sbWS5ZKPVL1b5oc/eVnRwW1cQx4zmYqcnhUnioWTd1M8dFiRQ7bkRAMVbw10bxST8Kp9otfTch5gFMTUWRGp0RmBB3p48151VTbw9MT4RuUfORxETgQExpCnheWPQfEu4EvfxYr4an1kDWAWTOGVjejjb39mkgZw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=ietf.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-armh-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9l9rtxD/XX6tzlWZr2oKtx6BYZmR+7D08/sRMIWWc70=; b=PjtI1zBQYEK4m1OvGEEtuVsuuyvr4nQTC1fuB8cLK7wkk3NMrVwe/uIMyufooaxgxY60CzcS/lcyiz8YQPvB4gA0jT7vVNokNEJ2oj1SuZsf9gUQV//WnQMWMLkBNdHV4cr4KhnBl/meD7o4w8qLu8NwCqtrwGP1/gx9Z+5owIE=
Received: from DB7PR05CA0014.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:36::27) by AM0PR08MB4356.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:13f::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5293.17; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:13:16 +0000
Received: from DBAEUR03FT024.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:36:cafe::e6) by DB7PR05CA0014.outlook.office365.com (2603:10a6:10:36::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5293.19 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:13:16 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 63.35.35.123) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of arm.com designates 63.35.35.123 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=63.35.35.123; helo=64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com; pr=C
Received: from 64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com (63.35.35.123) by DBAEUR03FT024.mail.protection.outlook.com (100.127.142.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5314.12 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:13:16 +0000
Received: ("Tessian outbound 4ab5a053767b:v120"); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:13:15 +0000
X-CheckRecipientChecked: true
X-CR-MTA-CID: e51273c5ee735a1a
X-CR-MTA-TID: 64aa7808
Received: from 077073b9498f.1 by 64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com id A44430DC-3170-47E1-98DE-099CBEC3E814.1; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:13:09 +0000
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com by 64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com with ESMTPS id 077073b9498f.1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:13:09 +0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fbec+t9cA5k96YjgFpPovDM0zGvkGhE8LVY3t+m1IH9e92FjDOje9f006IimTqIJ3gckZhGdbKoxn82nAelOwlcK9//D9n/Zl1eMYWYQeChw/t0SfIV7Ds9N8vvGV1wjuvf67WZioRVKt3cihFypZCaZO/3kAWEjLxPmZtdpzCOgpx6TzDPSV3GHois87MNyfG1m0Yyfx9z+Y0BdwIcQ0AxAzXr+v2Hoq17PF8WGJVCYnjP6pbLqEGH3WchEKbcMeHdfURWR6hcvvB8PEMvbXS2MfKh6AmIuoykNrbLgXqBhoYXt6Y1FL5AlfUOqldXOPCSfD8JZKt53ORLZPCSueA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=9l9rtxD/XX6tzlWZr2oKtx6BYZmR+7D08/sRMIWWc70=; b=JgZuQS3znovV+0RiWDCkKUSL92bx5w4Ttreqt6ENRVEkelU/Op6pOT0txt0uUJ8rtwT8NyY4HQ8KvQQ1XoKxo6+SX/boIFRefjGTtdKIkTfqVFPJxrAwqty9VX87N3jVPmfuUnlHpgMKgtDk9hbvgF1LgXnDFEwYuan42srCRESe+meGP+SAHKgr6JuzudnlVbCK1MvgzAuWmfbBGPYlsN50wwaqViVmTFrXMvccBIX+WeIp0wOWJDPIIs6AmQs3dpXhme1UMK1JadDKGfDso3ZAsMEOvAITXAniTyC8nKRXrJg1eD7TUci6BrNx09GsTqvOJjIpNoFQPmagtmBx5Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-armh-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9l9rtxD/XX6tzlWZr2oKtx6BYZmR+7D08/sRMIWWc70=; b=PjtI1zBQYEK4m1OvGEEtuVsuuyvr4nQTC1fuB8cLK7wkk3NMrVwe/uIMyufooaxgxY60CzcS/lcyiz8YQPvB4gA0jT7vVNokNEJ2oj1SuZsf9gUQV//WnQMWMLkBNdHV4cr4KhnBl/meD7o4w8qLu8NwCqtrwGP1/gx9Z+5owIE=
Received: from DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:251::8) by VE1PR08MB5280.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:10d::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5314.13; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:13:07 +0000
Received: from DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::adc5:f2d3:1920:7e3c]) by DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::adc5:f2d3:1920:7e3c%9]) with mapi id 15.20.5314.013; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:13:07 +0000
From: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
To: Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Thread-Index: AQHYdNVBQIUvzG7ccU+AIPnjCpX1Va05NHiAgAAygwCAABEqAIAAJvKAgACVswyAAGzSAIABeYjA
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:13:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DB9PR08MB6524EF37525128BB58E914CB9CDE9@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <45618431-7329-4F31-941F-A39BBC9D575F@cisco.com> <DB9PR08MB65241E9E259EBBD532480E469CDC9@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <30BB98D4-8CC0-4EA3-BB89-9F95DC6F2CA8@island-resort.com> <SJ0PR02MB83533D9FAAA5C935EFFE2BED81DC9@SJ0PR02MB8353.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <D6FBA9E8-EAF5-4D43-831E-4F11EEF56AC1@intel.com> <D4DFCC84-43A9-45F1-86CC-577665206643@island-resort.com> <DB9PR08MB6524A23DF4EF603E60641C449CDF9@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <SJ0PR02MB8353B3CAE4C2216DE827919D81DF9@SJ0PR02MB8353.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR02MB8353B3CAE4C2216DE827919D81DF9@SJ0PR02MB8353.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Authentication-Results-Original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 647c8d41-00d8-4e83-f058-08da4499a7b4
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR08MB5280:EE_|DBAEUR03FT024:EE_|AM0PR08MB4356:EE_
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <AM0PR08MB43562FC62A19983920AF90789CDE9@AM0PR08MB4356.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
x-checkrecipientrouted: true
nodisclaimer: true
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Untrusted: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info-Original: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(366004)(122000001)(55016003)(76116006)(8676002)(86362001)(38070700005)(2906002)(71200400001)(110136005)(38100700002)(186003)(83380400001)(7696005)(26005)(6506007)(9686003)(508600001)(316002)(8936002)(4744005)(66946007)(64756008)(5660300002)(52536014)(66476007)(66556008)(33656002)(91956017)(66446008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB9PR08MB6524EF37525128BB58E914CB9CDE9DB9PR08MB6524eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR08MB5280
Original-Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: DBAEUR03FT024.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id-Prvs: 3ef2789e-7793-4092-84f8-08da4499a2c5
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:63.35.35.123; CTRY:IE; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com; PTR:ec2-63-35-35-123.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(46966006)(36840700001)(40470700004)(6506007)(356005)(8676002)(86362001)(70206006)(70586007)(5660300002)(7696005)(33656002)(508600001)(83380400001)(336012)(47076005)(8936002)(55016003)(52536014)(316002)(2906002)(36860700001)(81166007)(9686003)(40460700003)(82310400005)(26005)(110136005)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2022 13:13:16.0528 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 647c8d41-00d8-4e83-f058-08da4499a7b4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d; Ip=[63.35.35.123]; Helo=[64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DBAEUR03FT024.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR08MB4356
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/w6WDfTi5ofcUJc6u9emQEyekmwM>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:13:27 -0000
> Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote: > I think the underlying data structures make it extensible, independent > of the CDDL notation. However if an implementor chooses to extend EAT > without an accompanying standard as a result, then interoperability > may not be assured. Therefore it is in an implementor’s interest to > define a standard if they are seeking interop. The core difference is the extensibility story for the claims-set is governed by the CWT Claims registry, whilst the EAT type system has no such mechanism (yet). IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
- [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/… Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Thomas Fossati
- [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC for h… Thomas Fossati
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Thomas Fossati
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Giridhar Mandyam
- [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for htt… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Ira McDonald
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Thomas Fossati
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Jeremy O'Donoghue
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Thomas Fossati
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Thomas Fossati
- Re: [Rats] Where does a EAT end? (was: Re: WGLC f… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Smith, Ned
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for… Giridhar Mandyam
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Carl Wallace
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Michael Richardson