Re: [Rats] Moving forward with Architecture work

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25161208C3 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:42:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PzmQrn0ndSLQ for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa06-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34697120089 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.122.0.82] ([45.56.150.85]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPA id SlndigURnsYZfSlndiRxn8; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:42:25 -0700
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Message-Id: <3C6FCA46-F734-463C-9EB0-D3C86EAA86A2@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_64B8D1EF-7F46-4351-8559-68F106270A0A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:42:25 -0800
In-Reply-To: <8333BFA8-C457-4710-A7A1-EFF185D304F0@cisco.com>
Cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
References: <8333BFA8-C457-4710-A7A1-EFF185D304F0@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPLwQBgxDtjaii3VmjWOXH5ME++4WZJMpjG7N6A1yk3ATQPZNxUBmf/RoT1u/1K+TUT1svvL/ZL9WU0y9vw7h1d7+UmZmFKrXZZwSJJXa3X38JOE7NYQ 4p1dOnBr30dbBvpoUTXTRVrK4lZIkSs7dEWLJM1aR35fnAzJ+epOf4AFGZpFfbcdrNZQcMNDi4jcKw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/tYnl_g2deE9ttRhlOFVboSM3sAM>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Moving forward with Architecture work
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 17:42:29 -0000

Sounds great!

LL

> On Nov 6, 2019, at 2:26 PM, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> RATS Participants,
> We continue to have good discussion on architecture draft content but now have two drafts that will be hard to get consensus on either one.  With each draft providing good benefits, we propose to create a new architecture editorial team to come up with a converged draft that addresses the readability concerns, use cases and terminology discussed thus far. Michael Richardson,  Henk, Dave Thaler and Ned have agreed to be this team and will work on putting out a converged draft soon.
>  
> Discussions are still encouraged to ensure all use case scenarios and workflows are considered; but wanted to ensure we had a targeted team to come up with a single proposed architecture document.
>  
> Warm regards,  Nancy and Kathleen
>  
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org <mailto:RATS@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>